Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Cell-free Biochemical Fluorometric Enzymatic Assay for High-throughput Measurement of Lipid Peroxidation in High Density Lipoprotein
Published on: October 12, 2017
No correlation and low agreement of imaging and inflammatory atherosclerosis' markers in familial
Lilton R C Martinez1, Marcio H Miname, Luiz A Bortolotto
1Lipid Clinic Heart Institute (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School Hospital, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Insights
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients show increased atherosclerosis and aortic stiffness. Clinical factors poorly predict these conditions, and imaging/inflammatory markers show low agreement for coronary heart disease risk prediction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Research
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disorder leading to high LDL-C levels and premature cardiovascular disease.
- Subclinical atherosclerosis and aortic stiffness are early indicators of cardiovascular risk.
- Inflammatory biomarkers may play a role in FH pathophysiology and disease progression.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate determinants of subclinical atherosclerosis (coronary and carotid) and aortic stiffness in FH.
- To examine the relationship between these vascular parameters and inflammatory biomarkers.
- To assess the agreement of imaging and inflammatory markers for coronary heart disease (CHD) prediction in FH.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study comparing 89 FH patients with 31 normal subjects (NL).
- Measurements included coronary calcium scores (CCS), carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), pulse wave velocity (PWV), C-reactive protein (CRP), and white blood cell count (WBC).
- Multivariate analysis identified independent determinants for IMT, PWV, and coronary artery calcification (CAC). Agreement between markers was assessed using kappa statistics.
Main Results:
- FH patients exhibited higher prevalence and severity of CAC, IMT, PWV, and WBC compared to NL (p<0.05).
- Independent determinants identified: IMT (systolic blood pressure, Framingham Risk Score [FRS], apolipoprotein B), PWV (age), and CAC (male gender, LDL-cholesterol year score [LYS]).
- Agreement between imaging and inflammatory markers for CHD prediction was poor (kappa<0.1), except for moderate agreement between IMT and PWV (kappa=0.5).
Conclusions:
- Clinical parameters inadequately explain vascular variability (IMT, CAC, PWV) in FH subjects.
- Imaging markers and inflammatory biomarkers demonstrate poor agreement in severity for predicting CHD risk in FH.
- Further research is needed to refine risk stratification in FH patients.
Abstract:
Our purpose was to study the determinants of coronary and carotid subclinical atherosclerosis, aortic stiffness and their relation with inflammatory biomarkers in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) subjects. Furthermore, we evaluated the agreement degree of imaging and inflammatory markers' severity used for coronary heart disease (CHD) prediction. Coronary calcium scores (CCS), carotid intima media thickness (IMT), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), C reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cells count (WBC) were determined in 89 FH patients (39+/-14 years, mean LDL-C=279 mg/dl) and in 31 normal subjects (NL). The following values were considered as imaging and biomarkers' severity: CCS>75th% for age and sex, IMT>900 microm, PWV>12 m/s, and CRP>3mg/l. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) prevalence and severity, IMT, PWV and WBC values were higher in FH than in NL (all parameters, p<0.05). After multivariate analysis, the following variables were considered independent determinants of (1) IMT: systolic blood pressure, 10-year CHD risk by Framingham risk scores (FRS) and apolipoprotein B (r(2)=0.33); (2) PWV: age (r(2)=0.35); (3) CAC as a continuous variable: male gender and LDL-cholesterol year score (LYS) (r(2)=0.32); (4) presence of CAC as dichotomous variable: FRS (p=0.0027) and LYS (p=0.0228). With the exception of a moderate agreement degree between IMT and PWV severity (kappa=0.5) all other markers had only a slight agreement level (kappa<0.1). In conclusion, clinical parameters poorly explained IMT, CAC and PWV variability in FH subjects. Furthermore, imaging markers and inflammatory biomarkers presented a poor agreement degree of their severity for CHD prediction.
Related Concept Videos
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Inflammation
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...