Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Distribution Reliability and Automation

Distribution Reliability and Automation

Distribution reliability in electrical power systems is critical for ensuring an uninterrupted power supply to consumers at minimal cost. According to IEEE Standard Terms, reliability is the probability that a device will function without failure over a specified time period or amount of usage. For electric power distribution, this translates to maintaining continuous power supply and addressing customer concerns over power outages. Several indices, as defined by IEEE Standard 1366-2012, are...

Measures of Intelligence

Measures of Intelligence

Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this; it...

Stereotype Content Model

Stereotype Content Model

The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence categorization, a person will feel...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Intelligent controllers as hierarchical stochastic automata.

IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics : a publication of the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society·2008

Same author

EMG pattern analysis and classification for a prosthetic arm.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·1982

Same author

Sexual activity after tubal ligation.

Medical aspects of human sexuality·1973

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Entropy-based reliability analysis for intelligent machines.

J C Musto¹, G N Saridis

¹Brady (W.H.) Co., Milwaukee, WI.

IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Part B, Cybernetics : a Publication of the IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society

|January 1, 1997

Summary

A novel metric assesses intelligent machine performance by integrating machine uncertainty and task uncertainty. This entropy-based measure is analogous to system reliability, offering a new way to evaluate machine capabilities.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Intelligent Systems Engineering
Machine Performance Metrics
Reliability Analysis

Background:

Traditional performance assessment methods may not fully capture the complexities of intelligent machines.
Existing metrics often fail to account for inherent machine uncertainty and task variability.

Purpose of the Study:

To introduce a new, entropy-based metric for evaluating the performance of intelligent machines.
To develop a measure that quantifies both machine uncertainty and task uncertainty.

Main Methods:

Fusing concepts from Saridis' Theory of Intelligent Machines (1988).
Integrating traditional reliability analysis techniques.
Employing an entropy-based approach to quantify uncertainty.

Main Results:

A novel metric for intelligent machine performance assessment was successfully developed.
The metric effectively reflects the uncertainty inherent in the intelligent machine.
The metric also quantifies the uncertainty allowed by the task description.
The developed metric demonstrates an analogy to system reliability measures.

Conclusions:

The proposed entropy-based metric offers a comprehensive approach to intelligent machine performance assessment.
This new metric provides valuable insights into system reliability by considering machine and task uncertainties.
The findings contribute to the advancement of intelligent machine evaluation methodologies.