Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
A comparative study of adolescent risk assessment instruments: predictive and incremental validity.
Jennifer L Welsh1, Fred Schmidt, Lauren McKinnon
1Lakehead University, USA.
This study evaluated adolescent risk assessment tools, finding the SAVRY demonstrated the most incremental validity in predicting general and violent recidivism among youth.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Psychology
- Adolescent Criminology
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- Adolescent risk assessment tools are increasingly used in clinical practice.
- Limited evidence exists on the predictive validity of these tools, individually and combined.
- Accurate risk assessment is crucial for effective intervention and public safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the predictive and incremental validity of three structured adolescent risk instruments: YLS/CMI, SAVRY, and PCL:YV.
- To assess their accuracy in predicting general and violent recidivism in adolescents.
- To identify the most effective tool for enhancing risk assessment accuracy.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of three structured risk assessment instruments: Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI), Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY), and Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version (PCL:YV).
- Utilized Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and hierarchical logistic regression analyses.
- Examined predictive and incremental validity concerning general and violent recidivism.
Main Results:
- All three risk assessment tools demonstrated varying degrees of accuracy in predicting general and violent recidivism.
- The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) exhibited the greatest incremental validity.
- Findings suggest differential utility of these tools in adolescent risk assessment.
Conclusions:
- The SAVRY shows promise as a valuable tool for improving the accuracy of adolescent risk assessments.
- Further research is needed to explore the combined use of these instruments and their clinical implications.
- Optimizing youth risk assessment strategies is essential for informed clinical decision-making and intervention planning.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Cognitive Development During Adolescence
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adolescence
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...