Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Ultrasound Assessment of Endothelial-Dependent Flow-Mediated Vasodilation of the Brachial Artery in Clinical Research
Published on: October 22, 2014
The effect of large unilamellar vesicles on vascular function in patients with coronary atherosclerosis
Todd Anderson1, Francois Charbonneau, Sammy Chan
1Department of Cardiac Sciences and the Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. todd.anderson@calgaryhealthregion.ca
Insights
Large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) did not improve overall endothelial function in vascular disease patients. However, a lower dose improved nitroglycerin-mediated dilation, suggesting potential dose-dependent effects for atherosclerosis treatment.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Research
- Vascular Biology
- Lipid Metabolism
Background:
- Endothelial dysfunction is a key factor in cardiovascular events, often targeted by LDL-lowering therapies.
- Novel methods for cholesterol removal from vessel walls are under investigation.
- The impact of large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) on human endothelial function remains unevaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effect of intravenous large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) infusion on endothelial function in patients with established vascular disease.
- To determine if LUVs alter brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation.
- To explore potential dose-dependent effects and safety profiles of LUVs therapy.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial involving 75 subjects with vascular disease.
- Participants received weekly intravenous infusions of 2g, 8g of LUVs, or placebo for four weeks.
- Endothelial function was assessed by measuring FMD and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation at baseline and post-treatment.
Main Results:
- Overall LUVs therapy did not change FMD but improved nitroglycerin-mediated dilation.
- The 2g LUVs group showed significant improvements in both FMD and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation.
- The 8g LUVs dose led to significantly higher unesterified cholesterol levels compared to other groups.
Conclusions:
- Large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) showed no overall improvement in FMD but enhanced nitroglycerin-mediated dilation.
- A 2g dose of LUVs demonstrated a beneficial effect on endothelial function markers.
- Further research is needed to confirm dose-dependent effects and the therapeutic role of LUVs in atherosclerosis.
Objective:
To evaluate the effect of large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) infusion on endothelial function. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) lowering, particularly with statins, results in rapid attenuation of endothelial dysfunction and decreases cardiovascular events. Unique methods of removing cholesterol from the vessel wall are being developed. The effect of LUVs on endothelial function has not been evaluated in humans.
Method:
75 subjects (mean age 61+/-10 years) with established vascular disease were randomized to receive either 2g, 8 g or matching placebo of LUVs as a weekly intravenous bolus infusion for 4 consecutive weeks. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation was measured at baseline and 1 week after the last infusion. The primary study outcome was the change from baseline in FMD in the active therapy groups combined. Predefined secondary end-points included nitroglycerin-mediated dilation and safety.
Results:
Active therapy (combined 2g+8 g treatment groups, n=49) did not result in a change in FMD, but did improve nitroglycerin dilation (p<0.05). However, a beneficial effect on both FMD (10.2+/-5.7% vs. 11.8+/-5.5%) and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (18.1+/-9.3% vs. 21.2+/-8.7%, both p<0.05) was seen in the 2-g group. Infusion of the 8-g dose resulted in significantly higher levels of unesterified cholesterol compared with the other groups during the study period (p<0.01).
Conclusion:
The current study demonstrated no overall effect of LUVs on FMD, however nitroglycerin-mediated dilation was improved. Further studies are required to clarify if there is a dose-dependent effect of this therapy and what its role is in subjects with atherosclerosis.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Atherosclerosis I: Introduction