Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Hypothesis Testing

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test

McNemar's Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there is a significant difference in proportions between two related groups when the outcome is binary (e.g., yes/no, success/failure). It is beneficial when we have paired data, such as pre-test/post-test designs, where the same subjects are measured under two different conditions. The test is named after the statistician Quinn McNemar, who introduced it in 1947. It is commonly used in situations where subjects are...

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A feedforward bidirectional associative memory.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2008

Same author

On overfitting, generalization, and randomly expanded training sets.

IEEE transactions on neural networks·2008

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

New nonleast-squares neural network learning algorithms for hypothesis testing.

D A Pados¹, P Papantoni-Kazakos

¹Dept. of Electr. Eng., Virginia Univ., Charlottesville, VA.

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks

|January 1, 1995

Summary

This study introduces novel supervised learning algorithms for neural networks to enhance hypothesis testing, classification, and pattern recognition. These methods guarantee optimization and offer improved performance over existing techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Pattern Recognition

Background:

Hypothesis testing encompasses classification, detection, and pattern recognition tasks.
Supervised learning algorithms are crucial for developing intelligent systems capable of these tasks.
Existing algorithms may have limitations in optimizing complex hypothesis testing scenarios.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose two new classes of supervised learning algorithms for feedforward neural networks.
To address the objective of hypothesis testing within these neural network structures.
To develop algorithms that guarantee optimization with probability one.

Main Methods:

Algorithms are based on stochastic approximation.
The first class applies the Neyman-Pearson approach, maximizing detection probability under false alarm constraints.
The second class minimizes error probability, leading to Bayes optimal designs.

Main Results:

Layer-by-layer optimal Neyman-Pearson and Bayes optimal designs were achieved.
Novel learning techniques were proposed, unifying existing algorithms.
Algorithms were tested on simulated hypothesis testing problems, with comparisons to backpropagation and perceptron learning.

Conclusions:

The proposed algorithms offer a robust framework for hypothesis testing in neural networks.
These methods provide guaranteed optimization and potentially superior performance.
The new techniques advance the field of supervised learning for complex pattern recognition tasks.