Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

A Retrograde Implantation Approach for Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement in Mice
Published on: July 20, 2022
Lessons for dialysis investigators from the Steno-2 Study
1Division of Nephrology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. phil.mcfarlane@utoronto.ca
Abstract:
People undergoing dialysis have a substantially shortened survival and a high rate of cardiovascular events. Recent clinical trials have failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of reducing traditional or dialysis-specific cardiovascular risk factors. The reasons for the failure of these clinical trials are unclear. One candidate explanation is that they lacked sufficient statistical power to detect important outcome differences. Several errors in trial design or execution can lead to trials being underpowered. An overestimation of the attributable risk of the condition of interest is a common error. Statistical models that partition attributable risk can be invalid when multiple risk factors are present, as is the case in dialysis patients. Diabetes investigators faced similar challenges in their early clinical trials. However, using only 160 people with diabetes, the Steno-2 Study demonstrated a 50% reduction in cardiovascular risk in people. This impressive result was achieved because patients in the experimental arm of the Steno-2 Study underwent reduction of multiple cardiovascular risk factors simultaneously. A Steno-2 Study approach would be an attractive trial design for dialysis investigators. It could be done with fewer resources than conventional randomized trials, and a positive result would strongly argue against therapeutic complacency in the dialysis unit. However, a variety of limitations to this approach exist. Most significantly, if positive, it would not be possible to determine which individual components of the intervention led to the improved outcomes. Despite the limitations, the Steno-2 design should currently be an attractive option for dialysis investigators.
Insights
Dialysis patients face shortened survival and high cardiovascular events. A Steno-2 Study approach, targeting multiple risk factors simultaneously, offers a potentially powerful and resource-efficient trial design for improving outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Clinical Trial Design
Background:
- Patients undergoing dialysis experience significantly reduced survival rates and a high incidence of cardiovascular events.
- Previous clinical trials targeting traditional or dialysis-specific cardiovascular risk factors have not shown a survival benefit.
- The reasons for the lack of benefit in prior trials remain unclear, with insufficient statistical power being a potential factor.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the potential of a Steno-2 Study-like approach for clinical trials in dialysis patients.
- To address the challenges of underpowered trials and complex risk factor interactions in this population.
- To propose an alternative trial design that could be more resource-efficient and impactful.
Main Methods:
- The abstract proposes adapting the Steno-2 Study methodology, which involved simultaneous reduction of multiple cardiovascular risk factors.
- This approach is contrasted with conventional randomized trials, highlighting potential resource savings.
- The limitations of this design, particularly in attributing outcomes to specific interventions, are acknowledged.
Main Results:
- The Steno-2 Study in diabetes patients demonstrated a 50% reduction in cardiovascular risk through multifactorial intervention.
- The abstract suggests this approach could yield significant results in dialysis patients, potentially arguing against therapeutic complacency.
- A key limitation is the inability to isolate the effect of individual interventions if the overall outcome is positive.
Conclusions:
- The Steno-2 Study design, involving simultaneous multifactorial risk factor reduction, presents an attractive and potentially more resource-efficient option for future clinical trials in dialysis patients.
- Despite limitations in determining individual intervention efficacy, this approach holds promise for improving cardiovascular outcomes.
- Further investigation into this trial design is warranted given the persistent challenges in improving survival for dialysis patients.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Dialysis
Acute kidney injury develops suddenly and can be caused by pre-renal causes (e.g., hypovolemia, shock), intrinsic renal causes (e.g., acute tubular necrosis), or post-renal causes (e.g., urinary obstruction). In contrast, chronic renal failure progresses gradually over time and is often...
Dialysis
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
