Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Vision and touch: multiple or multisensory representations of objects?

Simon Lacey1, Christine Campbell, K Sathian

  • 1Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. slacey@emory.edu

Perception
|February 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Memorable Medicine: How the BEAT Campaign could Impact the Future of Ovarian Cancer.

Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education·2026
Same author

Horizontal gene transfer and diploidy illuminate evolution and stress adaptation in oleaginous Scenedesmaceae (Chlorophyta).

Nature communications·2026
Same author

From input to impact: embedding PPI in computational ovarian cancer research.

Research involvement and engagement·2026
Same author

A Review of the Challenge of Pre-Existing Humoral Immunity in Adeno-Associated Virus Gene Therapy and Potential Solutions.

Human gene therapy·2026
Same author

Cervical high-risk human papillomavirus infection and its associated risk factors: a community-based cross-sectional study in hard-to-reach areas in Bangladesh.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Acoustic parameter combinations underlying mapping of pseudoword sounds to multiple domains of meaning: Representational similarity analyses and machine-learning models.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Evidence suggests a shared, spatial multisensory representation for objects, accessible through both vision and touch. Further research is needed on how visual imagery and cross-modal memory influence this representation.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Multisensory Processing
  • Perception

Background:

  • Understanding how the brain integrates visual and haptic information is crucial for cognitive science.
  • The nature of object representations derived from different senses remains a key research question.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review evidence on the format and properties of visual and haptic object representations.
  • To explore theoretical models and the role of visual imagery in multisensory integration.
  • To identify gaps in current research, particularly regarding cross-modal memory asymmetries.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on visual and haptic object representation.
  • Analysis of theoretical models of multisensory integration.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of visual imagery and cross-modal memory paradigms.

    • Main Results:

    • The majority of evidence supports a unified, spatial multisensory representation of objects.
    • This representation appears flexibly accessible by both sensory inputs and cognitive processes.
    • The possibility of efficient comparisons between separate modality-specific representations is not entirely excluded.

    Conclusions:

    • A shared, spatial multisensory representation is the most likely format for object information.
    • This representation is dynamically updated by both sensory data and internal cognitive states.
    • Further investigation into cross-modal memory asymmetries and the precise mechanisms of integration is warranted.