Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and CausationStatistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. A relationship between variables shows correlation, but it does not show cause-and-effect. A direct cause-and-effect relationship requires additional controlled experiments. If no consistent relationship exists between the variables, then there is no correlation.Correlation versus CausationIf the dependent variable increases or decreases when the...

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

Neural Circuits

Neural Circuits

Neural circuits and neuronal pools are two of the main structures found in the nervous system. Neural circuits are networks of neurons that work together to carry out a specific task or process. They consist of interconnected neurons and glial cells, which provide structural and metabolic support.
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Precise Measurement of Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry with Entangled Hyperon-Antihyperon Pairs.

Physical review letters·2026

Same author

Observation of Λ[over ¯]p→K^{+}π^{+}π^{-}π^{0} and Λ[over ¯]p→K^{+}π^{+}π^{-}2π^{0}.

Physical review letters·2026

Same author

Observation of a Threshold Enhancement in the π^{+}π^{-} Spectrum in ψ(3686)→π^{+}π^{-}J/ψ Decays.

Physical review letters·2026

Same author

[Expression of the melanoma 2-mediated pyroptosis pathway in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies].

Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences·2026

Same author

[A case report of delayed-onset diabetes mellitus complicated with primary adrenal insufficiency induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors].

Zhonghua nei ke za zhi·2025

Same author

Radiomics based on dual-energy CT for noninvasive prediction of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Radiography (London, England : 1995)·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

A neural network model of causality.

¹Dept. of Comput. Sci., Alabama Univ., Tuscaloosa, AL.

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks

|January 1, 1994

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This paper introduces a new fuzzy logic formalism (FEL) for commonsense causal reasoning. FEL models inexactness and cumulative evidence, bridging rule-based and neural network approaches.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Application of Granger Causality Analysis of the Directed Functional Connection in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: August 7, 2017

Area of Science:

Artificial Intelligence
Cognitive Science
Computational Linguistics

Background:

Existing causality models struggle with the inexact and cumulative nature of commonsense reasoning.
Neural networks offer a powerful framework but often lack explicit causal representation.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a novel model for commonsense causal reasoning.
To address limitations in existing causality accounts by incorporating fuzzy logic.
To integrate rule-based reasoning with neural network architectures.

Main Methods:

Development of a fuzzy logic based formalism (FEL) for causal reasoning.
Analysis of FEL's capability to handle inexactness and cumulative evidentiality.
Conceptualization of FEL's implementation within a neural (connectionist) network.

Main Results:

FEL effectively models the inexactness and cumulative evidentiality inherent in commonsense causal reasoning.
The proposed formalism overcomes limitations of previous causality models.
FEL provides a direct mapping between rule-encoding and neural network models.

Conclusions:

The fuzzy logic based formalism (FEL) offers a robust approach to commonsense causal reasoning.
FEL facilitates the integration of symbolic reasoning with connectionist models.
This work advances the development of more sophisticated AI reasoning systems.