Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Modeling Cataract Surgery in Mice
05:19

Modeling Cataract Surgery in Mice

Published on: December 1, 2023

Human Reliability Analysis of Cataract Surgery.

Vinod Gauba1, Peter Tsangaris, Charalambos Tossounis

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, St James' University Hospital, West Yorkshire, England. vgauba@aol.com

Archives of Ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
|February 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary

The Human Reliability Analysis of Cataract Surgery tool effectively identifies technical errors in phacoemulsification. Surgical experience significantly impacts error rates, highlighting areas for improved resident training and assessment.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A commentary on the updated research priorities in ophthalmology: implications and future directions.

Eye (London, England)·2026
Same author

The decision-making processes of UK general practice nurse prescribers when managing acute illness in patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: a qualitative study using think aloud and staged vignettes.

Primary health care research & development·2026
Same author

Pioneering Strategy of Circulation of Carbon Capture Toward Lithium-Ion Batteries.

Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2025
Same author

Re: Tzoumas et al.: Improved outcomes with heavy silicone oil in complex primary retinal detachment: a large multicenter matched cohort study (Ophthalmology. 2024;131:731-740).

Ophthalmology·2024
Same author

The UK clinical eye research strategy: refreshing research priorities for clinical eye research in the UK.

Eye (London, England)·2024
Same author

Electrophoretic Deposition of 58S Bioactive Glass- Polymer Composite Coatings on 316L Stainless Steel: An Optimization for Corrosion, Bioactivity, and Cytocompatibility.

ACS applied bio materials·2024

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgical Education
  • Medical Error Analysis

Background:

  • Phacoemulsification is a common cataract surgery technique.
  • Identifying technical errors is crucial for improving surgical outcomes and training.
  • The Human Reliability Analysis of Cataract Surgery (HRACS) tool offers a potential method for error analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the utility of the HRACS tool in identifying the frequency and patterns of technical errors during phacoemulsification.
  • To assess the impact of surgeon experience on error occurrence.

Main Methods:

  • An observational cohort study analyzed 33 phacoemulsification videos performed by surgeons with varying experience levels.
  • The HRACS tool was used by two independent assessors to analyze 330 surgical steps.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Modeling Cataract Surgery in Mice
05:19

Modeling Cataract Surgery in Mice

Published on: December 1, 2023

  • Errors were categorized as executional or procedural, and linked to surgeon experience.

    • Main Results:

    • A total of 228 errors were identified across 330 surgical steps.
    • Executional errors (66.2%) were more common than procedural errors (33.8%).
    • Sculpting and nucleus fragmentation showed the highest error probability, particularly in less experienced surgeons. Surgeon experience significantly influenced error rates (P < .001).

    Conclusions:

    • The HRACS tool is effective in pinpointing technical errors in phacoemulsification cataract surgery.
    • Findings indicate a high rate of executional errors, suggesting areas for enhancement in surgical training and assessment.
    • The HRACS tool demonstrated face, content, and construct validity.