Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026
Knotless Independent Double-Row Repair and Biceps Augmentation for Anterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears
Published on: January 23, 2026
The effect of dynamic external rotation comparing 2 footprint-restoring rotator cuff repair techniques
Maxwell C Park1, Jeremy A Idjadi, Neal S Elattrache
1Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Woodland Hills Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 5601 De Soto Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 91365, USA. mcp16@columbia.edu
Background:
Allowing for humeral external rotation while loading rotator cuff repairs has been shown to affect tendon biomechanics when compared with testing with the humerus fixed. Adding dynamic external rotation to a tendon-loading model using footprint-restoring repairs may improve our understanding of rotator cuff repair response to a common postoperative motion.
Hypothesis:
A tendon suture-bridging repair will demonstrate better load sharing compared to a double-row repair, and there will be a differential gap formation between the anterior and posterior tendon regions.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
In 6 fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders, a tendon suture-bridging rotator cuff repair was performed; a suture limb from each of 2 medial anchors was bridged over the tendon and fixed laterally with an interference screw. In 6 contralateral match-paired specimens, a double-row repair was performed. For all specimens, a custom jig was employed that allowed dynamic external rotation (0 degrees to 30 degrees ) with loading. A materials testing machine was used to cyclically load each repair from 0 N to 90 N for 30 cycles; each repair was then loaded to failure. A deformation rate of 1 mm/s was employed for all tests. Gap formation between tendon edge and insertion was measured using video digitizing software.
Results:
The yield load for the suture-bridging technique (161.88 +/- 35.09 N) was significantly larger than the double-row technique (135.17 +/- 24.03 N) (P = .026). The yield gap between tendon and lateral footprint was significantly greater anteriorly than posteriorly (1.62 +/- 0.82 mm and 0.68 +/- 0.47 mm, respectively) for the suture-bridging technique (P = .024) but not for the double-row technique (1.35 +/- 0.52 mm and 1.05 +/- 0.50 mm, respectively) (P = .34). There were no differences for gap formation, stiffness, ultimate load to failure, and energy absorbed to failure between the 2 repairs (P > .05). The anterior regions of the repair were the first to fail in all constructs. The suture-bridging repair remained interconnected for 5 of 6 repairs.
Conclusions:
The tendon suture-bridging rotator cuff repair has a yield load that is higher than the double-row repair when allowing for external rotation during load testing. External rotation can accentuate gap formation anteriorly at a repaired rotator cuff footprint.
Clinical Relevance:
Based on the tension of repair, there may be a role for reinforcing the repair anteriorly and limiting external rotation postoperatively.
