[Diagnostics of Lyme disease]
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Detecting the Lyme Disease Spirochete, Borrelia Burgdorferi, in Ticks Using Nested PCR
Published on: February 4, 2018
Jacek Gasiorowski1, Elzbieta Witecka-Knysz, Brygida Knysz
1Katedra i Klinika Chorób Zakaźnych, Chorób Watroby i Nabytych Niedoborów Odpornościowych Akademia Medyczna, Wrocław. jacekgasiorowski@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract:
Although many years have passed since Borrelia burgdorferi was first identified, advances in understanding biology and clinical course of infection made and new diagnostic procedures developed, Lyme disease is still difficult to diagnose. Therefore, it is often wrongly diagnosed and unnecessarily treated. In this paper we analyzed the latest data on Lyme disease diagnostic methods, paying much attention to their limitations and correct interpretation of results. In routine diagnosis of this diseases, indirect tests, based on the detection of specific IgM and IgG antibodies, are most useful. The Lyme disease diagnosis should begin with screening tests, which are highly sensitive but not specific enough and sometimes yield false positive results, then all positive results should be verified by confirmation tests, which allow to distinguish between true positive results and healthy individuals with false positive ones.
Related Concept Videos
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Myasthenia Gravis: Diagnostic Tests
The edrophonium test is a diagnostic tool for myasthenia gravis. It involves...
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests

