Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Birth weight is forever
1Epidemiology Branch, NIEHS, NIH, HHS, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. bassoo2@niehs.nih.gov
Insights
Birth weight impacts infant survival and adult mortality. Researchers caution against overemphasizing fetal growth, suggesting alternative mechanisms for these long-term health associations.
Area of Science:
- Epidemiology
- Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD)
Background:
- Birth weight is linked to infant morbidity and mortality.
- Associations extend to later-life outcomes, including adult mortality.
Discussion:
- While the fetal origin hypothesis is compelling, excessive focus on fetal growth may be misleading.
- The interplay between fetal programming and genetic predispositions needs further investigation.
- The observed associations between birth weight and health outcomes may not solely be driven by fetal growth alterations.
Key Insights:
- Birth weight's impact extends beyond infancy, influencing adult mortality.
- Mechanisms linking birth weight to long-term health are complex and debated.
- Caution is advised against overemphasizing fetal growth as the sole explanatory factor.
Outlook:
- Future research should explore the coexistence and relative contributions of fetal programming and genetic factors.
- Investigating alternative hypotheses beyond fetal growth is crucial for a comprehensive understanding.
- Re-evaluating the role of birth weight in infant survival may be necessary.
Abstract:
Birth weight is associated not just with infant morbidity and mortality, but with outcomes occurring much later in life, including adult mortality, as reported by a paper by Baker and colleagues in this issue of Epidemiology. While these associations are tantalizing per se, the truly interesting question concerns the mechanisms that underlie these links. The prevailing hypothesis suggests a "fetal origin" of diseases resulting from alterations in fetal nutrition that permanently program organ function. The most commonly proposed alternative is that factors, mainly genetic, that affect both fetal growth and disease risk are responsible for the observed associations. Although both mechanisms are intellectually attractive-and may well coexist-we should be cautious to not focus excessively on fetal growth. Doing this may lead us in the wrong direction, as has likely happened in the case of birth weight in relation to infant survival.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Mass and Weight
Mass and Weight
Normal Distribution
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Anatomy of the Intestines
Small Intestines
The small intestine is an ~7 meter-long tube with an inner diameter of just 2.5 cm. Since most nutrients are absorbed here, the inner lining of the small...

