Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Evaluation of the Cognitive Performance of Hypertensive Patients with Silent Cerebrovascular Lesions
Published on: April 23, 2021
The clinical significance of white-coat and masked hypertension
Paolo Verdecchia1, Fabio Angeli, Roberto Gattobigio
1Hospital S. Maria della Misericordia, Clinical Research Unit Preventive Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Perugia, Piazzale G. Menghini, Perugia, Italy. verdec@tin.it
Insights
Masked hypertension (MH) indicates a poor prognosis, unlike white-coat hypertension (WCH). Identifying patients with MH is crucial for timely intervention and improved cardiovascular outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Hypertension Research
Background:
- Self-measured blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABP) define masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension (WCH).
- MH is linked to greater target organ damage and cardiovascular events compared to normotension.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the prognostic impact of MH and WCH.
- To identify criteria for screening normotensive individuals at high risk for MH.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of studies on the prognostic significance of MH and WCH.
Main Results:
- White-coat hypertension (WCH) is associated with better outcomes, while masked hypertension (MH) predicts a poor outcome.
- Current guidelines for MH management focus on target organ damage due to normal clinic BP.
- Daytime ABP values >130/80 mmHg may indicate increased cardiovascular event risk, although 135/85 mmHg is often used as the threshold for normalcy.
Conclusions:
- The long-term prognosis for patients with WCH requires further investigation.
- The increased stroke risk suggested in WCH patients needs validation through large-scale studies.
Objective:
Self-measured blood pressure (BP) and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring are used to define the arbitrary clinical categories of masked hypertension (MH) and white-coat hypertension (WCH). Severity of target organ damage and incidence of major cardiovascular events are greater in patients with MH than in patients whose BP is normal both inside and outside the doctor's office.
Methods:
We reviewed studies that addressed the prognostic impact of MH and WCH.
Results:
Overall, WCH was associated with a better outcome and MH to a poor outcome. We, however, need the criteria to identify the clinically normotensive patients at elevated pretest probability of MH in whom a broad use of self-measured home BP and 24-hour ambulatory BP as screening tests may be appropriate and cost effective. Clinical management of patients with MH should continue to be based on current guidelines and mostly related to target organ damage and associated clinical conditions because of the normal values of clinic BP in these patients. WCH is generally defined by the coexistence of persistently high office BP with normal daytime or 24-hour ABP. Daytime ABP normalcy has been defined by values<135/85 mmHg. Data, however, suggest that incidence of cardiovascular events tends to increase consistently above the cut-off value of 130/80 mmHg for daytime BP.
Conclusion:
The long-term outcome of patients with WCH remains uncertain. Data suggesting an increased risk of stroke need to be confirmed in wide-scale studies.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Alterations in Blood Pressure
Hypertension (High blood pressure)
Hypertension occurs when blood pressure readings consistently exceed the normal range. It is diagnosed when systolic blood pressure (the top number, indicating pressure while the heart beats)...