Minimum requirements for a rapid and reliable routine identification and antibiogram of Fusobacterium necrophorum

A Jensen1, L Hagelskjaer Kristensen, H Nielsen

  • 1Department of Clinical Microbiology, Viborg Hospital, Heibergs Allé 4, 8800, Viborg, Denmark. Anders.Jensen@sygehusviborg.dk

Insights

Rapid identification of Fusobacterium necrophorum is achievable within 3-4 days using specific phenotypic tests. Penicillin and metronidazole remain the preferred antibiotics for treating F. necrophorum infections.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Clinical Diagnostics
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Fusobacterium necrophorum is a significant pathogen in human infections.
  • Accurate and timely identification of F. necrophorum is crucial for effective treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish minimum phenotypic requirements for rapid and reliable routine identification of Fusobacterium necrophorum.
  • To assess antibiotic susceptibility patterns of F. necrophorum isolates.

Main Methods:

  • Phenotypic characterization of 357 Fusobacterium necrophorum isolates from human infections.
  • Comparison of routine identification methods with full characterization and real-time PCR.
  • Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) for various antibiotics.

Main Results:

  • A set of phenotypic tests (colony morphology, kanamycin/metronidazole susceptibility, butyric acid odor, fluorescence, beta-hemolysis) allows for identification within 3-4 days.
  • 356 isolates were identified as F. necrophorum subsp. funduliforme and one as F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum.
  • All isolates were susceptible to penicillin and metronidazole; clindamycin showed good activity, while erythromycin should be avoided.

Conclusions:

  • Rapid and reliable identification of F. necrophorum is feasible using established phenotypic criteria.
  • Penicillin and metronidazole are confirmed as first-line antibiotics for F. necrophorum infections.
  • Clindamycin offers a viable alternative, whereas erythromycin is not recommended.

Related Concept Videos

Rapid Identification of Pathogens01:25

Rapid Identification of Pathogens

MALDI-TOF MS has transformed clinical microbiology by offering a rapid and reliable method for pathogen identification. The traditional approach to microbial identification typically involves time-consuming culture techniques and biochemical tests, which can delay the initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy. MALDI-TOF MS avoids these delays by using characteristic ribosomal protein mass patterns of microbial cells, enabling accurate species-level identification within minutes.Principle...
Methods of Classification and Identification01:28

Methods of Classification and Identification

Bacterial identification relies on a diverse array of techniques to classify and understand microorganisms, each tailored to uncover specific characteristics. Traditional morphological approaches, while still valuable, are limited for closely related or structurally simple organisms. Modern methods integrate biochemical, serological, genetic, and advanced molecular tools to achieve greater accuracy.Morphological and Biochemical TechniquesMorphological characteristics, such as cell shape and...
Automated Microbial Diagnostics01:24

Automated Microbial Diagnostics

Automated diagnostic analyzers have transformed clinical microbiology by providing rapid and reliable methods for pathogen identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Among these systems, the Vitek 2 is widely used because it automates the traditionally labor-intensive processes of microbial identification (ID) and antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), delivering standardized and timely results that are essential for effective patient care.Microbial Identification with ID CardsThe...