Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

A 1.5 Hour Procedure for Identification of Enterococcus Species Directly from Blood Cultures
Published on: February 10, 2011
Minimum requirements for a rapid and reliable routine identification and antibiogram of Fusobacterium necrophorum
A Jensen1, L Hagelskjaer Kristensen, H Nielsen
1Department of Clinical Microbiology, Viborg Hospital, Heibergs Allé 4, 8800, Viborg, Denmark. Anders.Jensen@sygehusviborg.dk
Abstract:
Three hundred fifty-seven isolates of Fusobacterium necrophorum from human infections in Denmark were consecutively collected over a 3 year period for the purpose of establishing the minimum requirements for rapid and reliable routine identification of Fusobacterium necrophorum using phenotypic characters. The first 40 isolates were fully characterized by the most common phenotypic tests mentioned in the literature, while the last 317 where identified solely by the established minimum requirements for rapid and reliable routine identification of Fusobacterium necrophorum. All but one isolate were identical in all phenotypic tests. The outlying strain differed in morphology and the ability to agglutinate erythrocytes. On the basis of our findings it should be possible within 3-4 days to identify and differentiate F. necrophorum from other species including other Fusobacterium spp. by the unique but subspecies specific colony morphology, susceptibility to kanamycin and metronidazole, the smell of butyric acid, chartreuse colour fluorescence, and beta-haemolysis on horse blood agar. Three-hundred fifty-six isolates were identified as F. necrophorum subsp. funduliforme while one strain was F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum. The species and subspecies level was confirmed for the first 40 isolates by real-time PCR. MIC in mg/l was determined for the 40 isolates. MIC(90) was 0.047 for penicillin, 0.047 for clindamycin, 0.25 for metronidazole, 0.38 for cefuroxime, >32 for imipenem, 0.012 for meropenem, and 2 for erythromycin. All 357 isolates were susceptible to penicillin and metronidazole indicating that these antibiotics are still the drugs of choice in antibiotic therapy of F. necrophorum infections, but therapy with clindamycin may be an alternative. Erythromycin should be avoided.
Insights
Rapid identification of Fusobacterium necrophorum is achievable within 3-4 days using specific phenotypic tests. Penicillin and metronidazole remain the preferred antibiotics for treating F. necrophorum infections.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- Fusobacterium necrophorum is a significant pathogen in human infections.
- Accurate and timely identification of F. necrophorum is crucial for effective treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish minimum phenotypic requirements for rapid and reliable routine identification of Fusobacterium necrophorum.
- To assess antibiotic susceptibility patterns of F. necrophorum isolates.
Main Methods:
- Phenotypic characterization of 357 Fusobacterium necrophorum isolates from human infections.
- Comparison of routine identification methods with full characterization and real-time PCR.
- Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) for various antibiotics.
Main Results:
- A set of phenotypic tests (colony morphology, kanamycin/metronidazole susceptibility, butyric acid odor, fluorescence, beta-hemolysis) allows for identification within 3-4 days.
- 356 isolates were identified as F. necrophorum subsp. funduliforme and one as F. necrophorum subsp. necrophorum.
- All isolates were susceptible to penicillin and metronidazole; clindamycin showed good activity, while erythromycin should be avoided.
Conclusions:
- Rapid and reliable identification of F. necrophorum is feasible using established phenotypic criteria.
- Penicillin and metronidazole are confirmed as first-line antibiotics for F. necrophorum infections.
- Clindamycin offers a viable alternative, whereas erythromycin is not recommended.
Related Concept Videos
Rapid Identification of Pathogens
Methods of Classification and Identification
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
