Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attentional costs in multiple-object tracking.

Michael Tombu1, Adriane E Seiffert

  • 1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 418A Wilson Hall, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. mike.tombu@vanderbilt.edu

Cognition
|February 19, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: A Limiting Channel Capacity of Visual Perception: Spreading Attention Divides the Rates of Perceptual Processes.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2020
Same author

A Limiting Channel Capacity of Visual Perception: Spreading Attention Divides the Rates of Perceptual Processes.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2020
Same author

Optimistic metacognitive judgments predict poor performance in relatively complex visual tasks.

Consciousness and cognition·2019
Same author

Are failures to look, to represent, or to learn associated with change blindness during screen-capture video learning?

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2018
Same author

The channel capacity of visual awareness divided among multiple moving objects.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2016
Same author

Looking ahead: attending to anticipatory locations increases perception of control.

Consciousness and cognition·2012
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Identifying distinct sources of whole number interference in children's decimal comparison: the role of numerical magnitude and inhibitory control.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Evidence for abstract spatial concept learning in young animals.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Blurred lines or clear boundaries? Synchrony and social dominance shape domain-specific self-other processing.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Knowability predicts curiosity and learning.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Throwing good effort after bad: Evidence for a sunk-cost effect in cognitive effort-based decision-making.

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Multiple-object tracking requires significant attention. Increased tracking difficulty, when concurrent with a tone task, significantly impairs performance, confirming attention

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Factors

Background:

  • Multiple-object tracking (MOT) is a fundamental cognitive function.
  • Understanding the attentional demands of MOT is crucial for explaining task success and failure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the attentional demands of multiple-object tracking.
  • To determine how manipulating tracking difficulty affects performance, particularly when concurrent with other tasks.

Main Methods:

  • A dual-task paradigm was employed, combining a speeded tone-pitch response task with MOT.
  • Tracking difficulty was manipulated by altering dot proximity and speed, both concurrently and sequentially with the tone task.
  • Object contrast was also manipulated in a control experiment.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Increased dot proximity and speed significantly impaired tracking performance more when occurring concurrently with the tone task.
  • Independent manipulation of proximity or speed was sufficient to elicit this pattern.
  • Object contrast manipulation did not show a similar concurrent effect.

Conclusions:

  • The findings support the view that moment-to-moment multiple-object tracking demands attention.
  • Factors that increase tracking difficulty, such as proximity and speed, place greater attentional load when occurring simultaneously with other tasks.
  • Identifying factors that modulate attentional demands can elucidate the mechanisms underlying tracking success and failure.