Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

05:25
An Experiment Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Robot-Assisted Multi-Joint Pointing Movements of the Lower Limb
Published on: June 7, 2024
Using 1/f noise to examine planning and control in a discrete aiming task
André B Valdez1, Eric L Amazeen
1Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Box 871104, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA. andre.valdez@asu.edu
Experimental Brain Research
|February 20, 2008
Summary
This study reveals that 1/f noise in aiming movements is linked to the overlap of planning and control processes. More 1/f noise appears when there
Area of Science:
- Motor control and biomechanics
- Human movement analysis
- Cognitive neuroscience
Background:
- 1/f noise, characterized by long-range dependence, is observed in various biological systems.
- Understanding the underlying processes generating 1/f noise in human motor control is crucial for explaining movement variability.
- Previous research has explored 1/f noise in handwriting and gait, but its role in aiming movements remains less understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the influence of spatial, physical, and timing constraints on planning and control in aiming movements.
- To quantify 1/f noise during aiming tasks under different speed conditions.
- To explore the relationship between 1/f noise characteristics and the interplay between motor planning and online control.
Main Methods:
- Participants performed aiming movements with objects of varying mass to different distances at preferred and maximal speeds.
- 1/f noise was quantified using power spectral density, standardized dispersion, rescaled range, and an autoregressive fractionally integrated moving average (ARFIMA) model selection.
- Movement data, including peak velocity, were analyzed to identify temporal patterns of 1/f noise.
Main Results:
- Analyses using four different methods showed consistent quantification of 1/f noise.
- More long-range (ARFIMA) models were selected at peak velocity during preferred-speed movements (Experiment 1) compared to fast movements (Experiment 2).
- A trend suggested increased 1/f noise at peak velocity during preferred-speed movements, indicating potential overlap of planning and control, which diminished during fast movements.
Conclusions:
- The findings suggest that 1/f noise in aiming movements may arise from the summation of short-range processes operating at different timescales.
- Sufficient time for both planning (slower process) and control (faster process) to interact appears to facilitate the emergence of 1/f noise.
- The results contribute to understanding the complex interplay of cognitive and motor processes underlying human movement variability.
