Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Fluid resuscitation: colloids vs crystalloids.

J L Vincent1

  • 1Department of Intensive Care, Erasme Hospital, Free University of Brussels, Belgium. jlvincen@ulb.ac.be

Acta Clinica Belgica
|February 21, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Core competencies in critical care for general medical practitioners in South Africa: A Delphi study.

The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society·2024
Same author

Proceedings of resources for optimal care of acute care and emergency surgery consensus summit Donegal Ireland.

World journal of emergency surgery : WJES·2017
Same author

Erratum to: Antimicrobials: a global alliance for optimizing their rational use in intra-abdominal infections (AGORA).

World journal of emergency surgery : WJES·2017
Same author

Preoperative abnormalities in serum sodium concentrations are associated with higher in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing major surgery.

British journal of anaesthesia·2015
Same author

Recent negative clinical trials in septic patients: maybe a good thing?

Minerva anestesiologica·2015
Same author

Elevated β-lactam concentrations associated with neurological deterioration in ICU septic patients.

Minerva anestesiologica·2014
Same journal

MEFV variants as phenotypic modifiers in ankylosing spondylitis: a genetic interaction analysis with HLA-B27.

Acta clinica Belgica·2026
Same journal

What Europe should (not) learn from the new Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

Acta clinica Belgica·2026
Same journal

Real-world evidence on In-hospital statin use and mortality in geriatric patients.

Acta clinica Belgica·2026
Same journal

TKI-associated proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome: a narrative review with clinical illustration in radio-iodine-refractory thyroid cancer.

Acta clinica Belgica·2026
Same journal

A decade of insulin pump therapy in a Belgian paediatric diabetes centre: longitudinal outcomes and evolving practices.

Acta clinica Belgica·2026
Same journal

Pneumococcal vaccination in Belgian adults: a practical translation of the 2025 Superior Health Council guidelines.

Acta clinica Belgica·2026
See all related articles

Fluid choice for critically-ill patients is debated. Current evidence does not favor one resuscitation fluid over another for survival benefits. Focus on adequate fluid volume for perfusion.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Nephrology
  • Pharmacology

Background:

  • The optimal fluid for resuscitation in critically-ill patients is a subject of ongoing debate.
  • All available fluid types, including crystalloids and colloids, present potential drawbacks.
  • No definitive studies demonstrate a survival advantage of one fluid over another in this patient population.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current understanding of fluid resuscitation choices in critically-ill patients.
  • To highlight the risks and benefits associated with different crystalloid and colloid solutions.
  • To identify the need for further research into specific fluid regimens for critically-ill patients, particularly those with acute kidney injury.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and synthesis of existing evidence on fluid resuscitation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of commonly used crystalloid solutions (e.g., Ringer's lactate, normal saline) and colloid solutions (e.g., dextrans, gelatin, albumin, hydroxyethyl starch).
  • Assessment of reported adverse effects, including hyperchloremic acidosis, renal impairment, anaphylaxis, and cost-effectiveness.

    • Main Results:

    • Balanced crystalloids may be preferable to normal saline, potentially reducing the risk of hyperchloremic acidosis and associated renal dysfunction.
    • Colloid solutions have varied profiles: dextrans are used less due to anaphylaxis risk, gelatin has limited efficacy, albumin is effective but costly, and hydroxyethyl starch may harm renal function.
    • Evidence remains insufficient to recommend specific fluid types for improved survival in critically-ill patients.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice of resuscitation fluid in critically-ill patients lacks clear evidence supporting one type over another for survival.
    • Physicians should prioritize adequate fluid administration to maintain perfusion over the specific type of fluid used, pending further research.
    • Further studies are essential to clarify the benefits and harms of specific fluid regimens, especially in patients with or at risk of acute kidney injury.