Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Drug-induced Sensitization of Adenylyl Cyclase: Assay Streamlining and Miniaturization for Small Molecule and siRNA Screening Applications
Published on: January 27, 2014
Endogenous regulators of G protein signaling differentially modulate full and partial mu-opioid agonists at adenylyl
M J Clark1, J J Linderman, J R Traynor
1Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract:
Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate the endogenous GTPase activity of Galpha(i/o) proteins to increase the rate of deactivation of active Galpha-GTP and Gbetagamma signaling molecules. Previous studies have suggested that RGS proteins are more effective on less efficiently coupled systems such as with partial agonist responses. To determine the role of endogenous RGS proteins in functional responses to mu-opioid agonists of different intrinsic efficacy, Galpha(i/o) subunits with a mutation at the pertussis toxin (PTX)-sensitive cysteine (C351I) and with or without a mutation at the RGS binding site (G184S) were stably expressed in C6 glioma cells expressing a mu-opioid receptor. Cells were treated overnight with PTX to inactivate endogenous G proteins. Maximal inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase by the low-efficacy partial agonists buprenorphine and nalbuphine was increased in cells expressing RGS-insensitive Galpha(o)(CIGS), Galpha(i2)(CIGS), or Galpha(i3)(CIGS) compared with their Galpha(CI) counterparts, but the RGS-insensitive mutation had little or no effect on the maximal inhibition by the higher efficacy agonists DAMGO and morphine. The potency of all the agonists to inhibit forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase was increased in cells expressing RGS-insensitive Galpha(o)(CIGS), Galpha(i2)(CIGS), or Galpha(i3)(CIGS), regardless of efficacy. These data are comparable with predictions based on a collision coupling model. In this model, the rate of G protein inactivation, which is modulated by RGS proteins, and the rate of G protein activation, which is affected by agonist intrinsic efficacy, determine the maximal agonist response and potency at adenylyl cyclase under steady state conditions.
Insights
Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins enhance mu-opioid receptor responses, particularly for low-efficacy agonists. RGS-insensitive mutations increased agonist potency and maximal response, supporting the collision coupling model.
Area of Science:
- Cellular signaling
- G protein-coupled receptors
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins accelerate GTPase activity of Galpha(i/o) proteins, deactivating signaling.
- RGS proteins are thought to be more effective in systems with partial agonist responses.
- The role of RGS proteins in mu-opioid receptor signaling with varying agonist efficacies is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of endogenous RGS proteins in functional responses to mu-opioid agonists with different intrinsic efficacies.
- To determine how RGS protein interaction affects agonist potency and maximal response.
Main Methods:
- Stable expression of modified Galpha(i/o) subunits (PTX-sensitive cysteine mutant with or without RGS binding site mutation) in mu-opioid receptor-expressing C6 glioma cells.
- Treatment with pertussis toxin (PTX) to inactivate endogenous G proteins.
- Measurement of maximal inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase by various mu-opioid agonists.
Main Results:
- Maximal inhibition by low-efficacy agonists (buprenorphine, nalbuphine) increased in cells with RGS-insensitive Galpha subunits, but not with high-efficacy agonists (DAMGO, morphine).
- Agonist potency to inhibit adenylyl cyclase increased in cells with RGS-insensitive Galpha subunits, irrespective of agonist efficacy.
- Data align with the collision coupling model, where RGS-modulated G protein inactivation and agonist efficacy influence steady-state responses.
Conclusions:
- Endogenous RGS proteins play a significant role in modulating functional responses to mu-opioid receptor agonists, especially those with lower intrinsic efficacy.
- The interaction between RGS proteins and G proteins is a key determinant of agonist potency and maximal response, as predicted by the collision coupling model.
More Related Videos
07:41A Kinetic Fluorescence-based Ca2+ Mobilization Assay to Identify G Protein-coupled Receptor Agonists, Antagonists, and Allosteric Modulators
Published on: February 20, 2018
06:03Real-Time cAMP Dynamics in Live Cells Using the Fluorescent cAMP Difference Detector In Situ
Published on: March 22, 2024
Related Concept Videos
GPCRs Regulate Adenylyl Cylase Activity
Two...
Opioid Receptors: Overview
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
G Protein-coupled Receptors
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
G-protein Coupled Receptors
G-protein Coupled Receptors