Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

The Phase Rule

The Phase Rule

The phase rule describes the relationship between the variance (degrees of freedom), the number of components, and the number of phases in a system at equilibrium.Variance is a concept that denotes the number of independent intensive properties (properties are those that do not depend on the amount of material in the system), such as temperature, pressure, and composition, that can be altered without impacting the number of phases in equilibrium.In a single-component system, such as pure water,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Phase-shifting interferometry corrupted by white and non-white additive noise.

Optics express·2011

Same author

Design of phase-shifting algorithms by fine-tuning spectral shaping.

Optics express·2011

Same author

Stable-marriages algorithm for preprocessing phase maps with discontinuity sources.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Phase-unwrapping algorithm based on an adaptive criterion.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Phase-unwrapping algorithm for noisy phase-map processing.

Applied optics·2010

Same author

Colorimetric matching by minimum-square-error fitting.

Applied optics·2010

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Published on: January 18, 2022

Method of error analysis for phase-measuring algorithms applied to photoelasticity.

J A Quiroga, A González-Cano

|February 21, 2008

Summary

This study introduces a novel error analysis method for photoelasticity, quantifying measurement errors using Jones matrices. The approach enhances accuracy in determining stress patterns like isoclinics and isochromatics.

More Related Videos

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Published on: February 23, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Experimental and Data Analysis Workflow for Soft Matter Nanoindentation

Published on: January 18, 2022

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Lens-free Video Microscopy for the Dynamic and Quantitative Analysis of Adherent Cell Culture

Published on: February 23, 2018

Area of Science:

Optics and Photonics
Materials Science
Experimental Mechanics

Background:

Photoelasticity is a crucial technique for analyzing stress distribution in materials.
Phase-measuring algorithms are widely used but susceptible to errors from optical components.
Quantifying these errors is essential for reliable stress analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a systematic method for error analysis in phase-measuring photoelasticity.
To quantify the contribution of individual optical elements to measurement error.
To validate the proposed method through comparisons with experimental data.

Main Methods:

Utilized Jones matrices to model perturbations caused by optical element imperfections.
Calculated the Jones matrix of a real circular polariscope by summing nominal and error contributions.
Applied the method to phase-measuring algorithms for isoclinics and isochromatics determination.

Main Results:

Successfully quantified individual error contributions from polariscope elements.
Demonstrated the method's applicability to phase-measuring algorithms.
Achieved good agreement between theoretical error analysis and experimental measurements.

Conclusions:

The proposed Jones matrix perturbation method provides a robust framework for photoelasticity error analysis.
This approach improves the accuracy and reliability of stress determination using phase-measuring techniques.
The findings are valuable for optimizing optical setups and interpreting experimental results in photoelasticity.