Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Prehospital Thrombolysis: A Manual from Berlin
Published on: November 26, 2013
Repeat thrombolysis or conservative therapy vs. rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis:
L Testa1, W J van Gaal, G G L Biondi-Zoccai
1Institute of Cardiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. luctes@gmail.com
Insights
Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) significantly reduces re-infarction risk in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with failed thrombolysis. While major adverse events and mortality risks are similar, PCI may increase minor bleeding.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Acute Coronary Syndromes
Background:
- Thrombolysis is the primary treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) globally, despite percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) advantages.
- Management strategies for failed thrombolysis remain controversial, with conflicting data from randomized controlled trials.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the risk-benefit profiles of repeat thrombolysis (RT) versus rescue PCI in STEMI patients experiencing failed initial thrombolysis.
- To evaluate key clinical outcomes including major adverse events, mortality, stroke, heart failure, and bleeding complications.
Main Methods:
- An adjusted indirect meta-analysis was performed on data from randomized controlled trials.
- Searched databases included BioMedCentral, CENTRAL, mRCT, and PubMed.
- Outcomes assessed: major adverse events (mortality and re-infarction composite), stroke, congestive heart failure, major bleeds, and minor bleeds.
Main Results:
- Eight trials involving 1318 patients were analyzed, with follow-up ranging from in-hospital to 6 months.
- Rescue PCI showed a significant 70% reduction in re-infarction risk (NNT 17) compared to conservative therapy, with no significant difference in overall mortality, major adverse events, stroke, or congestive heart failure.
- Rescue PCI was associated with an increased risk of minor bleeds (NNH 50) but not major bleeds.
Conclusions:
- Despite a modest observed benefit, these findings support the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as a rescue strategy following failed thrombolysis in STEMI patients.
- The reduction in re-infarction risk with rescue PCI is a key consideration in treatment decisions.
Background:
Despite proven advantages of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), thrombolysis remains the first line treatment for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) worldwide. Management of patients with failed thrombolysis is still debated, and data from existing randomized controlled trials are conflicting.
Aim:
To compare the risk/benefit profile of repeat thrombolysis (RT) vs. rescue PCI in patients with failed thrombolysis.
Methods:
Search of BioMedCentral, CENTRAL, mRCT and PubMed for randomized controlled trials comparing rescue PCI vs. conservative therapy and/or RT vs. conservative therapy. Outcomes of interest assessed by adjusted indirect meta-analysis: major adverse events (MAE, defined as the composite of overall mortality and re-infarction), stroke, congestive heart failure (CHF), major bleeds (MB), and minor bleeds. Overall mortality and re-infarction have been also analysed individually.
Results:
Eight trials were included (1318 patients). Follow-up ranged from 'in-hospital' to 6 months. No significant difference was found for the risk of MAE [OR 0.93(0.26-3.35), P = 0.4], overall mortality [OR 1.01(0.52-1.95), P = 0.15], stroke [OR 5.03(0.64-39.1), P = 0.58] and CHF [OR 0.74(0.28-1.96), P = 0.6]. Compared with conservative therapy, rescue PCI was associated with a 70% reduction in the risk of re-infarction [OR 0.32(0.14-0.74), P = 0.008], number needed to treat 17. No difference in terms of MB was found [OR 0.5(0.1-2.5), P = 0.09], while a greater risk of minor bleeds was observed with rescue PCI [OR 2.48(1.08-5.7), P = 0.04], number needed to harm 50.
Conclusion:
Although the observed benefit is modest, these data support the use of PCI after failed thrombolysis.
Related Concept Videos
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
