Complications of carotid artery stenting are largely preventable: a retrospective error analysis
Ravi K Veeraswamy1, Brian G Rubin, Luis A Sanchez
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. veeraswamy@emoryhealthcare.org
Insights
Minimizing complications in carotid artery stenting (CAS) is crucial. Analysis of 207 CAS procedures shows most neurologic events and technical failures are preventable through protocol adherence and technique optimization.
Area of Science:
- Interventional Cardiology
- Neurology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy for treating carotid stenosis.
- Minimizing procedure-related complications is essential for the widespread adoption and efficacy of CAS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze procedure-related complications in carotid artery stenting.
- To identify technical errors contributing to adverse events.
- To determine the preventability of complications and optimize CAS outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A failure analysis was conducted on 207 carotid stent procedures.
- All procedure-related complications were reviewed.
- Technical errors leading to adverse events were identified and categorized.
Main Results:
- The overall procedure-related stroke rate was 2.9%.
- The technical failure rate was 1.9%.
- No patient deaths were recorded; however, preventable events included protocol deviations and improper device selection for lesion characteristics.
Conclusions:
- The majority of neurologic events and technical complications during CAS are preventable.
- Adherence to technical protocols, appropriate use of protection devices (e.g., flow reversal), and careful management of aortic arch instrumentation can significantly improve CAS safety and efficacy.
- Optimizing technique and device selection can lead to exceptional outcomes in carotid artery stenting.
Abstract:
Procedure-related complications with carotid artery stenting must be minimized for it to be a valid treatment for carotid stenosis. Failure analysis was done for 207 carotid stent procedures. All complications were reviewed and technical errors were identified. The procedure-related stroke rate was 2.9%, technical failure rate was 1.9%, and no patients died. Two strokes resulted from protocol deviations. A third stroke occurred while crossing a long, irregular lesion with a protection device instead of establishing flow reversal. Excessive instrumentation of the aortic arch resulted in 2 strokes. Distal embolization occurred after open-cell stenting a friable lesion in 1 patient. The majority of neurologic events and technical complications that occur during carotid stenting are preventable. By adhering to technical protocols, avoiding excessive instrumentation in the aortic arch, using flow reversal in selected lesions, and matching the appropriate anatomy and stent, results of carotid artery stenting can be exceptional.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
