The effect of aprotinin on outcome after coronary-artery bypass grafting

Andrew D Shaw1, Mark Stafford-Smith, William D White

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27516, USA. andrew.shaw@duke.edu

Insights

Aprotinin use in cardiac surgery was linked to worse patient survival and increased kidney damage compared to other treatments. This study highlights potential risks associated with aprotinin in coronary revascularization procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Pharmacology
  • Nephrology

Background:

  • Recent studies suggest aprotinin may be linked to adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery patients.
  • This review examines the clinical experience with aprotinin at Duke University Medical Center.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the association between aprotinin use and patient outcomes.
  • To compare the effects of aprotinin, aminocaproic acid, and no antifibrinolytic therapy on mortality and renal function.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective review of 10,275 patients undergoing coronary revascularization between 1996 and 2005.
  • Logistic-regression models were used to predict aprotinin use and analyze long-term survival and renal function decline (serum creatinine levels).

Main Results:

  • 13.2% of patients received aprotinin, 66.8% received aminocaproic acid, and 20.0% received no antifibrinolytic therapy.
  • Aprotinin use was associated with significantly higher mortality (HR 1.32 vs. no therapy, HR 1.27 vs. aminocaproic acid).
  • Aprotinin was also linked to increased serum creatinine levels but not a higher incidence of dialysis.

Conclusions:

  • Patients receiving aprotinin experienced higher mortality rates.
  • Aprotinin use correlated with greater increases in serum creatinine levels compared to aminocaproic acid or no antifibrinolytic therapy.
Abstract