Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018
Evoked potentials in the ICU
A Amantini1, A Amadori, S Fossi
1University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Sciences, UO Neurophysiopatology, Firenze, Italy. amantini@unifi.it
Continuous neurophysiological monitoring using electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials offers valuable insights into cerebral function in neurosurgical intensive care units. This technique effectively detects deterioration in brain injury patients, complementing other monitoring methods.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neurosurgery
- Intensive Care Medicine
Background:
- Neurophysiological techniques like electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are crucial for evaluating cerebral function in comatose patients.
- These methods complement clinical assessment and neuroimaging, serving diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring roles in neurosurgical intensive care units (NICUs).
- While discontinuous monitoring suffices for diagnosis, continuous monitoring is essential for maximizing clinical impact during critical care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the utility of continuous electroencephalography-somatosensory evoked potential (EEG-SSEP) monitoring in a neurosurgical intensive care unit.
- To compare the correlation of SSEPs with patient outcomes and intracranial pressure (ICP) in acute brain injury.
- To assess the feasibility and clinical relevance of real-time neurophysiological monitoring in critically ill neurosurgical patients.
Main Methods:
- A pilot study was conducted involving continuous EEG-SSEP monitoring in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).
- Patients had a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) <9 and underwent intracranial pressure monitoring.
- Clinical status, CT scans, SSEPs, and ICP were assessed to evaluate neurophysiological changes in relation to clinical deterioration and outcomes.
Main Results:
- Patients who were clinically stable showed no significant SSEP modifications.
- Clinical deterioration (observed in 23% of patients) was consistently associated with significant SSEP modifications.
- SSEPs demonstrated a strong correlation with short-term outcomes, whereas ICP showed a poor correlation.
Conclusions:
- Continuous EEG-SSEP monitoring is a valuable tool in the NICU, complementing other monitored parameters.
- Neurophysiological monitoring, particularly EEG-SSEP, provides insights into cerebral parenchymal metabolic activity during acute brain injury, unlike ICP which is merely a pressure index.
- SSEPs are a superior indicator of early prognosis in traumatic and hypoxic-ischemic coma compared to GCS, CT scans, and EEG alone, and should be combined with clinical examination.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Action Potentials
Electroconvulsive Therapy

