Nitrosoureas lomustine, carmustine and fotemustine induced hepatotoxic perturbations in rats: biochemical,

A Laquerriere1, G Raguenez-Viotte, M Paraire

  • 1Laboratoire d'anatomo-pathologie et de cytologie pathologique, Hôpital Charles Nicolle, C.H.U., Rouen, France.

European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
|January 1, 1991
PubMed

Insights

Chloroethylnitrosoureas like lomustine and carmustine are hepatotoxic, causing liver damage. Fotemustine, however, is non-hepatotoxic and affects liver cell cycles differently, offering a potentially safer alternative.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatotoxicity and cellular kinetics of nitrosoureas
  • Comparative analysis of anticancer drug effects on liver cells

Background:

  • Chloroethylnitrosoureas are effective anticancer agents but lomustine and carmustine cause liver damage.
  • Fotemustine demonstrates a lack of hepatotoxicity at therapeutic doses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of lomustine, carmustine, and fotemustine on rat liver cell cytotoxicity and kinetics.
  • To compare the cellular and morphological changes induced by these three nitrosoureas.

Main Methods:

  • In vivo study of rat liver cells treated with lomustine, carmustine, and fotemustine.
  • Flow cytofluorometry used to analyze DNA cell distribution and cell cycle phases.
  • Morphological assessment of liver tissues at 3 months post-treatment.

Main Results:

  • Lomustine and carmustine induced G2 + M phase cell cycle arrest and subsequent perturbations.
  • Fotemustine preferentially induced S phase perturbations without significant hepatotoxicity.
  • Higher doses of lomustine and carmustine resulted in more severe liver lesions.

Conclusions:

  • Lomustine and carmustine induce similar, dose-dependent hepatocyte cell cycle alterations.
  • Fotemustine exhibits a distinct, less toxic profile with preferential S phase effects.
  • Fotemustine represents a potentially safer alternative to lomustine and carmustine regarding hepatotoxicity.