Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
Assessment of prognosis of cirrhosis
François Durand1, Dominique Valla
1Pôle des Maladies del' Appareil Digestif, Service d'Hépatologie, Université Paris VII, INSERM, U773, Centre de Recherche Biomédicale Bichat Beaujon CRB3, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France. francois.durand@bjn.aphp.fr
Insights
The Child-Pugh score for cirrhosis prognosis has limitations. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score offers a more objective assessment for liver disease severity and transplant prioritization.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Clinical Prognostics
- Transplantation Medicine
Background:
- Cirrhosis decompensation significantly increases short-term mortality risk.
- Liver transplantation has improved outcomes for decompensated cirrhosis patients.
- The Child-Pugh score, a long-standing prognostic tool, suffers from subjective variable interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score as a prognostic marker in cirrhosis.
- To compare the objectivity and accuracy of MELD versus Child-Pugh score.
- To assess MELD's utility in liver transplant candidate prioritization.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on cirrhosis prognostic scores.
- Analysis of MELD score's objective variables (serum bilirubin, creatinine, INR).
- Comparison of MELD and Child-Pugh score performance in predicting mortality and prioritizing transplants.
Main Results:
- MELD score provides a more objective and continuous assessment of liver disease severity compared to Child-Pugh.
- MELD score is a robust predictor of early mortality in various cirrhosis etiologies.
- While MELD improves upon Child-Pugh, 10-20% of patients may still be misclassified, necessitating MELD exceptions.
Conclusions:
- MELD score is a valuable tool for assessing cirrhosis prognosis and prioritizing liver transplant candidates.
- The objectivity of MELD reduces subjective bias inherent in the Child-Pugh score.
- Further research and specific approaches (MELD exceptions) are needed for comprehensive cirrhosis management.
Abstract:
Once patients with cirrhosis experience decompensation, early mortality risk increases sharply. Liver transplantation has transformed the prognosis of decompensated cirrhosis. Child-Pugh score has been the reference for many years for assessing the prognosis of cirrhosis. However, Child-Pugh score has important limitations among which is subjective interpretation of some of its variables, making it difficult to categorize patients according to their own disease severity. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, which was originally designed for assessing the prognosis of cirrhotic patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), is a continuous score relying on three objective variables. Along with TIPS, MELD score proved to be a robust marker of early mortality across a wide spectrum of causes of cirrhosis, even though 10 to 20% of patients are still misclassified. MELD is especially useful for prioritizing candidates for transplantation according to a "sickest first" policy. However, MELD is not a universal prognostic marker of cirrhosis and several MELD exceptions require more specific approaches.
Related Concept Videos
Cirrhosis I: Introduction
Cirrhosis II: Pathophysiology
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):