Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
Neonatal hip instability: a prospective comparison of clinical examination and anterior dynamic ultrasound
T Finnbogason1, H Jorulf, E Söderman
1Department of Pediatric Radiology, Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. throstur.finnbogason@karolinska.se
Insights
Anterior dynamic ultrasound significantly reduces overtreatment for neonatal hip instability compared to clinical exams. This method decreased treatment rates by over 40%, improving diagnostic accuracy in newborns.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Neonatal hip instability assessment traditionally relies on clinical examination.
- Clinical examination, while sensitive, can lead to overtreatment of infant hip conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare anterior dynamic ultrasound with clinical examination for neonatal hip instability.
- To evaluate the impact of each method on treatment rates.
Main Methods:
- Anterior dynamic ultrasound was performed on 536 infants with risk factors or clinical signs of hip instability.
- Results were compared to standard clinical hip examinations conducted by pediatric orthopedic surgeons.
Main Results:
- Dynamic ultrasound identified 87.8% of hips as normal, versus 81.7% with clinical exams.
- The treatment rate decreased from 0.85% (clinical) to 0.49% (ultrasound), a reduction of over 40%.
Conclusions:
- Anterior dynamic ultrasound offers a more accurate assessment of neonatal hip instability.
- Implementing dynamic ultrasound can significantly decrease unnecessary treatment in newborns.
Background:
Ultrasound is increasingly being used to complement the clinical examination in assessing neonatal hip instability. The clinical examination, although highly sensitive in detecting hip instability, can lead to considerable overtreatment.
Purpose:
To compare anterior dynamic ultrasound and clinical examination in the assessment of neonatal hip instability and regarding treatment rates.
Material And Methods:
536 newborn infants (out of a population of 18,031) were selected, on the basis of a combination of risk factors, clinical signs of hip instability or ambiguous clinical findings, to undergo an anterior dynamic ultrasound examination of the hip, by a method developed by our group. This examination, performed by one out of seven experienced examiners, was compared with the standard clinical hip examination conducted by one of four pediatric orthopedic surgeons. The clinical examination was carried out both prior to and within a few hours after the ultrasound examination.
Results:
The clinical examination diagnosed 81.7% of the hips as normal, 14.5% as unstable, and 3.8% as dislocatable or dislocated. With the dynamic ultrasound method, the corresponding figures were 87.8%, 10.4%, and 1.8%, respectively. Use of the criteria of the clinical examination resulted in treatment of 147 infants. Using the dynamic ultrasound examination as a criterion meant that 87 infants would receive treatment. The calculated treatment rate was 0.85% when based on the clinical stress test and 0.49% when based on the dynamic ultrasound.
Conclusion:
The dynamic ultrasound results reduced the treatment rate by over 40% when used as a basis for the decision regarding treatment.
