Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
Published on: August 22, 2018
Quantifying variability of avian colours: are signalling traits more variable?
1Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Radolfzell, Germany. delhey@orn.mpg.de
Sexual selection theory predicts increased trait variability, especially in bright coloration. This study confirms higher color variability in sexually selected traits but finds no general increase in male or dimorphic color variability, challenging some evolutionary assumptions.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary biology
- Animal coloration
- Sexual selection
Background:
- Condition-dependent handicap models posit that trait variability, particularly in sexually selected ornaments, is maintained by individual quality.
- These models predict amplified variability in sexually selected traits, greater male than female variability, and higher variability in sexually dimorphic traits.
- Previous tests focused on metric traits, neglecting bright coloration, a prominent sexual trait, due to measurement challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a method for quantifying perceived color variation in animal coloration.
- To test predictions of sexual selection theory regarding trait variability in bird coloration.
- To investigate the relationship between sexual selection, condition-dependence, and color variability.
Main Methods:
- Developed a novel index to quantify chromatic color variation based on avian color vision models.
- Compared color variability in ornamental and non-ornamental patches across six bird species.
- Analyzed variability in relation to sexual selection and sexual dimorphism.
Main Results:
- Confirmed that sexually selected or quality-indicating colored patches exhibit increased chromatic variability.
- Found no general support for increased variability in males compared to females.
- Observed no association between sexual dichromatism and increased color variability.
Conclusions:
- Demonstrated a viable method for estimating perceived color variability, applicable to traits difficult to quantify otherwise.
- Provided evidence supporting sexual selection theory's prediction of increased variability in selected colors.
- Highlighted that sexual differences in variability may not always be driven by the same selective forces, particularly concerning sex differences and dimorphism.
Related Concept Videos
Mate Choice
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used; instead...
Complementation Tests
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
Epistasis
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Frequency-dependent Selection

