Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
Published on: December 24, 2015
Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures and the Supreme Court's reliability test in light of eyewitness
Gary L Wells1, Deah S Quinlivan
1Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, West 112 Lago, Ames, IA 50011, USA. glwells@iastate.edu
Abstract:
The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling concerning suggestive eyewitness identification procedures (Manson v. Braithwaite, 1977, 432 U.S. 98) has not been revisited by the Court in the intervening 30+ years. Meanwhile, scientific studies of eyewitnesses have progressed and DNA exonerations show that mistaken identification is the primary cause of convictions of the innocent. We analyzed the two-inquiry logic in Manson in light of eyewitness science. Several problems are discussed. Ironically, we note that suggestive identification procedures (determined in the first inquiry) boost the eyewitnesses' standing on three of the five criteria (used in the second inquiry) that are used to decide whether the suggestive procedures were a problem. The net effect undermines safeguards intended by the Court and destroys incentives to avoid suggestive procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function like a...
The Scientific Method
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Reliability and Validity
Statistical Significance
Hindsight Biases

