Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
[Methodological approaches of clinical studies with targeted therapies]
Nicolas Penel1, Julia Saleron, Amélie Lansiaux
1Département de cancérologie générale, Centre Oscar-Lambret, 3, rue F.-Combemale, 59020 Lille, France.
Abstract:
The development of molecular targeted therapies requires some specific methodological approaches. Dose-limiting toxicities are rare in phase I studies the maximal tolerated dose is rarely established. On the contrary, the biological active dose is often determined as the dose inducing biological effect on the target without significant clinical toxicity. Several designs of phase II are described (selection phase II, randomized phase II, stratified phase II...). All of them are indicated in specific situations. The discontinuation treatment studies and the validation of biomarkers (as surrogate endpoints or as classifiers) are the two main particularities of phase III studies designed for the assessment of molecular targeted therapies.
Insights
Designing molecular targeted therapies requires unique methods. Phase I trials focus on biological effect dose, not maximal tolerated dose, while Phase III studies validate biomarkers and use discontinuation designs.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trial Design
Context:
- Molecular targeted therapies represent a paradigm shift in cancer treatment, necessitating specialized clinical trial methodologies.
- Traditional dose-finding methods, like establishing the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) in Phase I studies, are often insufficient for these agents due to rare dose-limiting toxicities.
Purpose:
- To outline the specific methodological approaches required for the development of molecular targeted therapies.
- To describe the distinct designs and objectives of Phase II and Phase III clinical trials for molecular targeted therapies.
Summary:
- Phase I trials for molecular targeted therapies often identify the biologically active dose (BAD) rather than the MTD, focusing on target engagement and biological effect.
- Phase II trials employ various designs (selection, randomized, stratified) tailored to specific clinical situations and therapeutic hypotheses.
- Phase III trials are characterized by discontinuation designs and the crucial validation of biomarkers, serving as surrogate endpoints or predictive classifiers.
Impact:
- This methodological framework is essential for efficiently and effectively evaluating novel molecular targeted therapies.
- Optimized trial designs ensure the accurate assessment of efficacy and safety, facilitating the translation of these agents to clinical practice.
More Related Videos
09:19Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
08:59Looking for Driver Pathways of Acquired Resistance to Targeted Therapy: Drug Resistant Subclone Generation and Sensitivity Restoring by Gene Knock-down
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Clinical Trials: Overview