Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Adoptive Immunotherapy of iNKT Cells in Glucose-6-Phosphate Isomerase (G6PI)-Induced RA Mice
Published on: January 31, 2020
Treatment response to a second or third TNF-inhibitor in RA: results from the South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group
J A Karlsson1, L E Kristensen, M C Kapetanovic
1Department of Rheumatology, Lund University Hospital, SE 221 85 Lund, Sweden.
Objectives:
To study treatment response rates of RA patients undergoing second- and third-line anti-TNF therapy and to identify baseline predictors of response to second-line treatment.
Methods:
RA patients monitored in a prospective, observational study, having switched anti-TNF therapy once (first-time switchers, n = 337) or twice (second-time switchers, n = 36)--i.e. following failures with one antibody- and one receptor-type agent--between March 1999 and December 2006, were studied. Treatment responses at 3 months were assessed by the ACR and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria. Predictive potentials for response to second-line treatment of demographics, baseline disease activity measures, disease and treatment characteristics were analysed using logistic regression.
Results:
ACR20 response was met by 51% of first-time and 35% of second-time switchers. Corresponding ACR50 rates were 27 and 18%; EULAR overall rates (EULAR good or moderate response) 71 and 58%; EULAR good rates 25 and 9% and 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) remission rates 16 and 6%. Identified baseline predictors of response to second-line treatment were lower age and HAQ scores, elevated DAS28 values and having ceased the former anti-TNF treatment due to adverse events rather than inefficacy. No variable was predictive for all examined response criteria.
Conclusions:
Response rates of first-time anti-TNF switchers are somewhat below those of anti-TNF naïve RA patients, while the markedly inferior response rates of second-time switchers suggest other therapeutic options to be considered in this situation. Identified baseline predictors of response may be useful indicators to second-line anti-TNF therapy, but vary depending on the response criteria set studied.
Insights
Response rates for rheumatoid arthritis patients switching anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy are lower for those switching twice. Baseline predictors for second-line anti-TNF treatment response include lower age and HAQ scores.
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease.
- Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies are crucial for RA management.
- Understanding treatment response in patients switching anti-TNF agents is vital for optimizing care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate treatment response rates in RA patients receiving second- and third-line anti-TNF therapy.
- To identify baseline predictors of response to second-line anti-TNF treatment.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, observational study of RA patients switching anti-TNF therapy.
- Patients categorized as first-time switchers (n=337) or second-time switchers (n=36).
- Response assessed at 3 months using ACR and EULAR criteria; logistic regression used for predictor analysis.
Main Results:
- ACR20 response rates were 51% for first-time and 35% for second-time switchers.
- EULAR overall response rates were 71% and 58%, respectively.
- Predictors for second-line response included lower age, lower HAQ, higher DAS28, and prior adverse events.
Conclusions:
- Response rates to second-line anti-TNF therapy are lower than in anti-TNF-naïve patients.
- Significantly lower response rates in second-time switchers suggest alternative therapies should be considered.
- Identified predictors may aid in selecting patients for second-line anti-TNF treatment, but vary by response criteria.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
T Cell Types and Functions
Th1 cells stimulate dendritic cells to express necessary co-stimulatory molecules on their surfaces for...
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
The JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway
