Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Stopping a trial early in oncology: for patients or for industry?
F Trotta1, G Apolone2, S Garattini2
1Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), Rome.
Background:
The aim of this study is to assess the use of interim analyses in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) testing new anticancer drugs, focussing on oncological clinical trials stopped early for benefit.
Materials And Methods:
All published clinical trials stopped early for benefit and published in the last 11 years, regarding anticancer drugs and containing an interim analysis, were assessed.
Results:
Twenty-five RCTs were analysed. The evaluation of efficacy was protocol planned through time-related primary end points, >40% of them overall survival. In 95% of studies, at the interim analysis, efficacy was evaluated using the same end point as planned for the final analysis. As a consequence of early stopping after the interim analysis, approximately 3300 patients/events across all studies were spared. More than 78% of the RCTs published in the last 3 years were used for registration purposes.
Conclusion:
Though criticism of the poor quality of oncological trials seems out of place, unfortunately early termination raises new concerns. The relation between sparing patients and saving time and trial costs indicates that there is a market-driven intent. We believe that only untruncated trials can provide a full level of evidence which can be translated into clinical practice without further confirmative trials.
Insights
Early stopping of cancer drug trials via interim analyses spares patients but raises concerns about evidence quality. Untruncated trials offer more reliable data for clinical practice.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Assessing the utilization of interim analyses in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for novel anticancer drug development.
- Focusing on oncological clinical trials that were terminated early due to demonstrated benefit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the practice and implications of early stopping in cancer clinical trials based on interim analysis results.
- To investigate the quality of evidence generated from early-terminated oncological trials.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of published clinical trials stopped early for benefit over the last 11 years.
- Inclusion criteria: anticancer drugs, randomized controlled trials, and presence of an interim analysis.
Main Results:
- Analyzed 25 RCTs; over 40% used overall survival as a time-related primary endpoint.
- Efficacy evaluation at interim analysis consistently used the planned final analysis endpoint (95% of studies).
- Early termination spared approximately 3300 patients/events; 78% of recent trials were used for drug registration.
Conclusions:
- While early stopping spares patients and resources, it raises concerns about the completeness of evidence.
- The drive for early termination may be influenced by market and cost considerations.
- Uninterrupted trials provide a higher level of evidence for reliable clinical translation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...

