Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Defining genetic interaction.

Ramamurthy Mani1, Robert P St Onge, John L Hartman

  • 1Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 250 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
|February 29, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Image-based, pooled phenotyping reveals multidimensional, disease-specific variant effects.

Cell·2026
Same author

Global genetic interaction network of a human cell maps conserved principles and informs functional interpretation of gene co-essentiality profiles.

Cell·2026
Same author

Experimental assessment of AI-based interactome mapping.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Chromosome-scale genome assembly and characterization of Saccharomycopsis schoenii, a necrotrophic predatory yeast.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

A scalable approach to resolving variants of uncertain significance.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Mapping the Functional Landscape of <i>KCNQ1</i> to Define Ion Channel Mechanisms and Arrhythmia Risk.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same journal

The TaMYB55-TaSnRK1α1-TabZIP9 module confers heat stress tolerance in wheat.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Superstatistics approach to turbulent circulation fluctuations.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

A molecular timescale for evolution of cobamide biosynthesis.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Pierre Chambon, a pioneer of molecular biology and gene regulation in eukaryotes.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Granulosa cell glycogen fuels the avascular corpus luteum.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Synthetic essentiality of TRAIL/TNFSF10 in VHL-deficient renal cell carcinoma.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
See all related articles

Understanding genetic interactions is key to discovering gene functions. Different mathematical definitions can impact results, with Product and Log definitions proving superior for identifying functional gene relationships.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Systems Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Genetic interactions reveal functional relationships between genes and pathways.
  • Synergistic interactions in double mutants can identify compensatory pathways or protein complexes.
  • Four distinct mathematical definitions (Product, Additive, Log, Min) are used for genetic interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the practical consequences of using different mathematical definitions for genetic interactions.
  • To determine which definitions are most effective for identifying functional gene relationships.
  • To compare the impact of different definitions on conclusions regarding the evolution of sexual reproduction.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of genetic interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparison of four mathematical definitions: Product, Additive, Log, and Min.
  • Evaluation of the ability of each definition to identify functional relationships and evolutionary conclusions.

    • Main Results:

    • The choice of definition significantly impacts the inference of genetic interactions.
    • Product and Log definitions are practically equivalent and superior to the Min definition for identifying functional relationships.
    • Additive and Log definitions yield different conclusions regarding the selective advantages of sexual reproduction.

    Conclusions:

    • The selection of a mathematical definition for genetic interactions has profound consequences.
    • Product and Log definitions are recommended for identifying functional gene relationships.
    • Careful consideration of definitions is crucial when studying genetic interactions and evolutionary processes.