Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Correlation and Causation01:27

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and CausationStatistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. A relationship between variables shows correlation, but it does not show cause-and-effect. A direct cause-and-effect relationship requires additional controlled experiments. If no consistent relationship exists between the variables, then there is no correlation.Correlation versus CausationIf the dependent variable increases or decreases when the...
Microbial Interactions: Predation01:28

Microbial Interactions: Predation

Microbial predation refers to the process by which one microorganism kills and consumes another to obtain nutrients and energy. It encompasses both bacterial and protozoan predators. This interaction plays a crucial role in shaping microbial communities and regulating nutrient cycling.Bacterial Predators: Epibiotic vs. EndobioticBacterial predators are classified based on their mode of attack as either epibiotic or endobiotic. Epibiotic predators, such as Vampirococcus, attach to the surface of...
Symbiosis00:58

Symbiosis

Symbiotic relationships are long-term, close interactions between individuals of different species that affect the distribution and abundance of those species. When a relationship is beneficial to both species, this is called mutualism. When the relationship is beneficial to one species but neither beneficial nor harmful to the other species, this is called commensalism. When one organism is harmed to benefit another, the relationship is known as parasitism. These types of relationships often...
Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Exposure, Response and Effect01:26

Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Relationship: Exposure, Response and Effect

The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationship describes the intricate link between drug exposure, efficacy, and toxicity, forming the foundation for optimal dosing regimens. This relationship uses mathematical modeling to characterize drug concentration-effect dynamics, ensuring precise therapeutic outcomes.Exposure represents the pharmacokinetic aspect of the PK-PD relationship, denoting the drug amount that elicits a biological response. It is typically quantified by administered...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DREDge: robust motion correction for high-density extracellular recordings across species.

Nature methods·2025
Same author

Prey depletion, interspecific competition, and the energetics of hunting in endangered African wild dogs, <i>Lycaon pictus</i>.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Neonatal antipredator tactics shape female movement patterns in large herbivores.

Nature ecology & evolution·2024
Same author

Spatial Risk Effects From Lions Compound Impacts of Prey Depletion on African Wild Dogs.

Ecology and evolution·2024
Same author

Long-term data reveal fitness costs of anthropogenic prey depletion for a subordinate competitor, the African wild dog (<i>Lycaon pictus</i>).

Ecology and evolution·2024
Same author

Stimulation of caudal inferior and middle frontal gyri disrupts planning during spoken interaction.

Current biology : CB·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

Relationships between direct predation and risk effects.

Scott Creel1, David Christianson

  • 1Department of Ecology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA. screel@montana.edu

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|March 1, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Predator risk effects, where prey change behavior due to perceived threats, significantly impact populations. These behavioral changes can be more substantial than direct predation, affecting conservation strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter
10:20

Linking Predation Risk, Herbivore Physiological Stress and Microbial Decomposition of Plant Litter

Published on: March 12, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Conservation Biology

Background:

  • Predation risk influences prey behavior, imposing costs.
  • Empirical evidence shows these risk effects can be substantial.
  • Current vertebrate conservation often overlooks risk effects, focusing on direct predation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the significance of risk effects in ecological dynamics.
  • To emphasize that risk effects can be larger than direct predation.
  • To argue for the inclusion of risk effects in conservation and management.

Main Methods:

  • The study is a conceptual synthesis and review of existing literature.
  • It analyzes the implications of behavioral prey responses to predators.
  • It contrasts direct predation effects with indirect risk effects.

Main Results:

  • Risk effects can exceed direct predation impacts.
  • Risk effects can persist even with zero direct predation.
  • Risk effects on reproduction may be misattributed to other factors like food limitation.

Conclusions:

  • Ignoring risk effects in conservation is scientifically unsound.
  • Behavioral changes in prey due to predators are critical population drivers.
  • A comprehensive understanding of predation requires integrating both direct and risk effects.