Decision trees versus support vector machine for classification of androgen receptor ligands
A Panaye1, J P Doucet, J Devillers
1ITODYS, Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot, UMR7086 CNRS, Paris, France. panaye@univ-paris-diderot.fr
This study developed in silico models to predict chemical toxicity, specifically focusing on endocrine disruptors and their androgen receptor binding affinity. The models effectively classified chemicals, aiding in reducing experimental toxicity testing.
Area of Science:
- Computational toxicology
- Environmental chemistry
- Endocrinology
Background:
- Increasing need for in silico models to predict chemical toxicity due to limitations in experimental assays.
- Endocrine disruptors are environmental and industrial chemicals that can interfere with natural hormone functions.
- Structure-activity relationship (SAR) models are crucial for predicting endocrine disruption potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate in silico models for categorizing the relative binding affinity (RBA) of diverse chemicals to the androgen receptor.
- To identify key chemical descriptors influencing androgen receptor binding.
- To compare the performance of recursive partitioning trees with support vector machines for this classification task.
Main Methods:
- Utilized a dataset of approximately 200 chemicals across various structural classes.
- Employed recursive partitioning trees for classification based on descriptors from CODESSA software.
- Calculated topological, geometrical, and quantum chemical properties as descriptors, including hydrophobicity (log P) and charge distribution parameters.
Main Results:
- Successfully classified chemicals into four activity groups based on log RBA values.
- Hydrophobicity, Balaban index, and charge distribution descriptors were identified as key factors in chemical partitioning.
- Achieved straightforward separation for strongly active and approximately 90% of inactive compounds.
- More complex trees were required for differentiating moderate and weak binders.
Conclusions:
- In silico models, particularly recursive partitioning trees, demonstrate significant potential for predicting androgen receptor binding affinity.
- Key chemical descriptors related to hydrophobicity and charge distribution are critical for accurate toxicity predictions.
- The developed models offer a viable alternative to experimental assays for screening endocrine-disrupting chemicals.
More Related Videos
10:29Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Published on: May 9, 2025
09:07Detecting the Ligand-binding Domain Dimerization Activity of Estrogen Receptor Alpha Using the Mammalian Two-Hybrid Assay
Published on: December 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with one...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers
Nonselective α-blockers: Nonselective α-blockers contain haloalkylamine or imidazoline moieties. Phenoxybenzamine, with a haloalkylamine...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Ligand Binding Sites
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of the aromatic...
