Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Measuring Psoriasis Severity at Home
Published on: March 1, 2024
Alternative scoring of the Cutaneous Assessment Tool in juvenile dermatomyositis: results using abbreviated formats
Adam M Huber1, Peter A Lachenbruch, Elizabeth M Dugan
1Izaak Walton Killam Health Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. adam.huber@iwk.nshealth.ca
Insights
Alternative scoring methods for the Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT) in juvenile dermatomyositis (DM) maintain measurement characteristics. These shorter methods, maximum and binary, offer similar reliability and validity to the original CAT, improving clinical and research utility.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Rheumatology
- Dermatology
- Clinical Assessment Tools
Background:
- The Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT) is a comprehensive method for assessing skin disease in juvenile dermatomyositis (DM).
- Evaluating the CAT's measurement characteristics with alternative scoring methods is crucial for its clinical application.
- Shortening assessment tools can improve clinician and researcher engagement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate alternative scoring methods (maximum and binary) for the CAT in juvenile DM.
- To determine if these abbreviated methods compromise the CAT's measurement properties.
- To assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of modified CAT scoring.
Main Methods:
- 113 children with juvenile DM were assessed at baseline, with 94 reassessed after 7-9 months.
- Interrater reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness were compared across original, maximum, and binary CAT scoring methods.
- Spearman correlations were used to compare scoring methods with each other and with other myositis disease activity measures.
Main Results:
- The maximum and binary CAT scoring methods showed high correlations (0.96-0.98) with the original method for both activity and damage scores.
- All three scoring methods demonstrated similar interrater reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness.
- No statistically significant differences were found between the scoring methods, despite a trend towards higher interrater reliability for the maximum method and higher responsiveness for the binary method.
Conclusions:
- The maximum and binary scoring methods for the CAT exhibit comparable measurement characteristics to the original method.
- Adopting these abbreviated scoring methods is recommended to enhance the CAT's clinical and research acceptability.
- These findings support the use of simplified CAT scoring for efficient juvenile DM assessment.
Objective:
The Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT) is a comprehensive, semiquantitative tool for the assessment of skin disease in juvenile dermatomyositis (DM). The goal of this study was to determine whether alternative scoring methods would shorten the CAT without compromising its measurement characteristics.
Methods:
A total of 113 children with juvenile DM were assessed at baseline; 94 were assessed again 7-9 months later. Interrater reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness were obtained using the original scoring method and 2 alternative methods: the maximum and binary scoring methods.
Results:
Spearman's correlations of the maximum and binary methods with the original were both 0.98 (P < 0.0001) for the CAT activity score, and 0.96 and 0.98, respectively (P < 0.0001), for the CAT damage score. Values obtained for interrater reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness were similar for all 3 scoring methods. Although there was a trend toward the maximum method having higher interrater reliability and the binary method having higher responsiveness, the confidence intervals were overlapping and no statistically significant differences were observed. Correlation coefficients for the 3 scoring methods with other measures of myositis disease activity and damage were very similar.
Conclusion:
The maximum and binary methods of scoring the CAT have measurement characteristics similar to the original method. Adoption of one of these abbreviated scoring methods should increase its acceptability to clinicians and researchers.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...