Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

11:09
High-Resolution Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Small Animals
Published on: December 16, 2022
Normal limits for left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes determined by gated single photon emission computed
Milan Lomsky1, Lena Johansson, Peter Gjertsson
1Department of Clinical Physiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. milan.lomsky@vgregion.se
Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging
|March 4, 2008
Summary
Gender-specific normal limits for left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) and volumes differ between CAFU and quantitative-gated SPECT (QGS) software. Applying these distinct criteria is crucial for accurate interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Medical Physics
Background:
- Accurate assessment of left ventricular (LV) function is vital in cardiovascular disease management.
- Myocardial perfusion-gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provides functional and volumetric data.
- Different quantification software packages may yield varying normal limits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare gender-specific normal limits for LV ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV).
- To evaluate differences in these parameters derived from two gated SPECT quantification methods: CAFU and quantitative-gated SPECT (QGS).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 185 patients with normal or probably normal stress/rest perfusion SPECT.
- Gated SPECT studies utilized a Tc-99m sestamibi protocol.
- Image quantification performed using CAFU and QGS software packages.
Main Results:
- CAFU software yielded higher lower normal limits for LV EF in both women (59% vs. 53%) and men (54% vs. 47%) compared to QGS.
- CAFU software showed higher upper normal limits for LV EDV in women (133 vs. 107 ml) and men (182 vs. 161 ml) than QGS.
- Differences in LV ESV normal limits between software were minimal.
Conclusions:
- Gender-specific normal limits for LV EF and volumes are necessary when using gated SPECT.
- Software-dependent criteria for abnormal LV EF and EDV should be applied for accurate interpretation in men and women.

