Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Stimulated Single Fiber Electromyography (SFEMG) for Assessing Neuromuscular Junction Transmission in Rodent Models
Published on: March 8, 2024
Rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements associated with different Rocuronium injection method
Seung-Hoon Baek1, Chul-Min Woo, Hyeon-Jeong Lee
1Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
Insights
Infusing rocuronium (a muscle relaxant) significantly reduces withdrawal movements during tracheal intubation in children. This method is as effective as bolus injection for intubation and muscle relaxation, offering a more comfortable experience.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pediatric Anesthesia
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Rocuronium bolus injections commonly cause pain and withdrawal movements in pediatric patients.
- Minimizing patient discomfort during anesthesia induction is a key clinical goal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence and intensity of rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements between intravenous bolus and infusion injections in children.
- To evaluate the impact of different rocuronium administration methods on intubating conditions and muscle relaxation onset.
Main Methods:
- 120 pediatric patients (3-15 years) were randomized into four groups receiving either bolus or infusion rocuronium (0.6 or 0.9 mg/kg).
- Withdrawal movements were assessed using a 4-grade scale, and intubating conditions were evaluated.
- Rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation time was measured via single twitch stimulation.
Main Results:
- Infusion administration significantly reduced both the incidence (33.3% vs. 100%) and intensity of withdrawal movements compared to bolus injection (P < 0.05).
- All groups achieved clinically acceptable to excellent intubating conditions.
- No significant differences in muscle relaxation duration were observed between bolus and infusion groups.
Conclusions:
- Infusion rocuronium effectively reduces injection-related withdrawal movements in children undergoing tracheal intubation.
- Rocuronium infusion does not compromise intubating conditions or delay the onset of muscle relaxation.
- Infusion administration represents a more comfortable alternative for rocuronium delivery in pediatric anesthesia.
Objectives:
One hundred and twenty patients (3-15 years old) were randomly enrolled (four groups: each group = 30 patients) in the study.
Aim:
The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and intensity of rocuronium-induced withdrawal movements in children injected with a typical intravenous bolus injection of rocuronium or with an infusion injection of rocuronium.
Background:
Intravenous bolus injection of rocuronium produces pain and withdrawal movement.
Methods:
Immediately after loss of consciousness by thiopental sodium (5 mg x kg(-1)), 0.6 mg x kg(-1) (B0.6, I0.6) or 0.9 mg x kg(-1) rocuronium (B0.9, I0.9) was injected by different method, either a bolus injection over 5 s (B0.6, B0.9) or an infusion injection lasting for 1 min (I0.6, I0.9). The withdrawal movement of the patients to the injection of rocuronium was assessed (four-grade score: 0-3). Intubating condition was assessed. Rocuronium-induced muscle relaxation time was measured by single twitch stimulation fade out.
Results:
The incidence (group B: 100%, group I: 33.3%) and the intensity of the withdrawal movements were significantly lower in the infusion groups compared with the bolus groups (P < 0.05). The intubating conditions for all groups were clinically acceptable (good to excellent). There was no significant difference in the muscle relaxation time between the different injection groups (I0.6; 105.6 +/- 7.7 vs B0.6; 114.6 +/- 8.0, I0.9; 69.2 +/- 3.6 vs B0.9; 73.4 +/- 1/0).
Conclusions:
The infusion injection of rocuronium for tracheal intubation significantly reduced the incidence and intensity of withdrawal movement on injection of rocuronium, and it neither delays the onset of muscle relaxation nor deteriorates the intubating condition.
Related Concept Videos
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Depolarizing Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Succinylcholine is the most commonly used depolarizing blocker. Chemically, it constitutes two molecules of acetylcholine joined together by an acetate methyl group. They act on the receptors in the same way as acetylcholine. Because succinylcholine...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacokinetics
Instead, they are transported by the blood to different tissues. Muscles with a greater blood supply (arteries) and blood flow receive more...

