A randomized crossover trial of conservative snoring treatments: mandibular repositioning splint and nasal CPAP
Stuart Robertson1, Maria Murray, David Young
1Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, Scotland, UK. stuart@glasgow.org
Objective:
To compare the effectiveness of a mandibular repositioning splint (MRS) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device as first-line treatments for disruptive snoring.
Study Design:
Prospective randomized crossover trial.
Subjects And Methods:
Twenty snorers received 3 months of treatment with both an MRS and nasal CPAP. Snoring Outcomes Survey (SOS), Snoring Bed Partner Survey, and Epworth questionnaires were completed serially. Changes in questionnaire scores were analyzed with a general linear statistical model and by analysis of variance.
Results:
There was a significant difference between the three preference outcomes for the mean SOS changes (P = 0.003). The mean SOS change was significantly greater for those who preferred MRS to CPAP (mean score difference, 27.15). Eight snorers chose final long-term MRS treatment, five chose nasal CPAP, and seven chose neither.
Conclusion:
The majority of disruptive snorers can be managed effectively with conservative treatments and therefore avoid surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Blind Procedures
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.

