Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026
Symptom Assessment of Patients with Allergic Rhinitis Using an Allergen Exposure Chamber
Published on: March 3, 2023
Prospective analysis of epicutaneous testing for inhalant allergy: comparison of arm and back subsites with mRAST
Pete S Batra1, Kathy Yappel-Sinkko, James Bena
1Section of Nasal and Sinus Disorders, Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. batrap@ccf.org
Objectives:
1) To compare epicutaneous testing (ET) from four skin subsites (forearm, upper arm, upper back, lower back) and 2) to compare ET to modified RAST (mRAST) for inhalant allergens.
Study Design:
Prospective clinical trial.
Subjects And Methods:
Fifty one patients underwent ET at four skin subsites and mRAST to six antigens and positive and negative controls.
Results:
The forearm and upper back showed best sensitivity to positive controls and all subsites demonstrated similar specificity to negative controls. The forearm and upper back demonstrated best sensitivity and specificity for most antigens. No statistically significant differences were noted for antigen sensitivity and specificity for the four subsites. ET and mRAST agreed best on D. farinae and timothy grass and least on short ragweed and dog epithelium.
Conclusion:
This study confirms that forearm and upper back demonstrate very good sensitivity and specificity for positive and negative controls and most tested antigens. This has important diagnostic implications for clinical practice of inhalant allergy.
