Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Methods for estimating medical expenditures attributable to intimate partner violence
Derek S Brown1, Eric A Finkelstein, James A Mercy
1RTI International, Public Health Economics Program, 3040 Cornwallis Road, PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. dsbrown@rti.org
Estimating the medical cost of intimate partner violence (IPV) for U.S. adult women reveals a substantial healthcare burden, ranging from $2.3 to $7.0 billion annually. Different estimation methods yield varied results but confirm IPV
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Sociology
Background:
- Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a significant public health issue with considerable medical costs.
- Accurate estimation of the economic burden of IPV is crucial for resource allocation and intervention planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare three distinct methodologies for estimating the medical cost burden of intimate partner violence (IPV) in U.S. adult women.
- To analyze the range of cost estimates and explore reasons for discrepancies between different approaches.
Main Methods:
- Utilized prevalence data from the National Violence Against Women Survey.
- Integrated cost data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, Medicare 5% sample, and published studies.
- Incorporated relative risk estimates from published research to compute medical cost burden within one year post-victimization.
Main Results:
- Estimated medical cost burden of IPV for women victimized within the past year ranged from USD 2.3 billion to USD 7.0 billion.
- The wide range in estimates is attributed to differences in methodology, data sources, and assumptions.
- All methods consistently demonstrated a substantial financial impact on the healthcare system.
Conclusions:
- Intimate partner violence imposes a significant and quantifiable medical cost burden on the U.S. healthcare system.
- No single method emerged as a definitive 'gold standard,' highlighting the complexity of cost estimation in this area.
- Further research is needed to refine methodologies and reduce variability in cost burden estimates.
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
