Related Experiment Videos
The founder's dilemma
1Harvard Business School, Boston, USA. noam@hbs.edu
Harvard Business Review
|March 5, 2008
Summary
Founders face a trade-off between company wealth and personal control. Giving up more equity can build a more valuable company, but often leads to a founder's replacement as CEO.
Area of Science:
- Entrepreneurship
- Business Strategy
- Organizational Behavior
Background:
- Founders often prioritize wealth and control when starting businesses.
- Research suggests these two goals may be incompatible for long-term company success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the inherent tension between maximizing founder wealth and maintaining founder control.
- To provide insights into founder decision-making regarding equity distribution and company growth.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of founder equity decisions and subsequent company valuation.
- Case studies examining founders who prioritized wealth versus control.
Main Results:
- Founders relinquishing more equity to co-founders, employees, and investors tend to build more valuable companies.
- Achieving superior returns often necessitates replacing the founding CEO with experienced management.
- Founders must make a "rich" versus "king" trade-off to optimize wealth or control.
Conclusions:
- Founders prioritizing control should focus on capital-light businesses and leverage existing expertise.
- Founders prioritizing wealth can engage investors earlier and transition to new roles post-succession.
- Defining success as either wealth accumulation or sustained control is crucial for founder satisfaction.
Related Concept Videos
01:17Ethical Dilemmas I
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...
01:30Ethical Dilemmas II
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
01:34Groupthink
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
02:45Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
01:14Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...