Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Neuroscience nursing research: human subjects considerations.

A M Williams1

  • 1College of Nursing, Arizona State University, Tempe 85287.

The Journal of Neuroscience Nursing : Journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses
|April 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval requires careful planning, especially for vulnerable populations. Researchers should seek guidance from institutional personnel and prioritize clear communication with subjects to address IRB concerns effectively.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The misclassification of periodic limb movement disorder: A systematic review applying research diagnostic criteria.

Sleep medicine reviews·2026
Same author

Increase Your Chances of Publishing: Navigating the Peer-Review Process.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same author

Neuroscience, cognitive function, and expertise in sport.

Neuropsychologia·2025
Same author

Neuroimaging and perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: A narrative review of research and future directions.

Neuropsychologia·2024
Same author

Occupational health screening during Gurkha Central Selection: a retrospective cohort study.

BMJ military health·2024
Same author

The role of peripheral vision during decision-making in dynamic viewing sequences.

Journal of sports sciences·2024

Area of Science:

  • Medical research ethics
  • Clinical trial administration

Background:

  • Gaining approval from all involved institutions is a prerequisite for conducting research.
  • Research involving special populations may undergo heightened scrutiny by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance on facilitating research approval processes.
  • To address common concerns raised by Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).

Main Methods:

  • The study outlines strategies for navigating the IRB approval process.
  • Key recommendations include leveraging institutional resources and ensuring clear subject communication.

Main Results:

  • Utilizing institutional personnel, such as IRB secretaries and research nurses, can provide valuable insights.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing strategies to enhance comprehension in informed consent is crucial.
  • Addressing IRB concerns regarding subject communication, particularly for impaired individuals, is paramount.

    • Conclusions:

    • Proactive engagement with institutional resources and a focus on clear, comprehensible communication are vital for successful IRB approval.
    • Understanding and addressing specific IRB concerns, especially those related to vulnerable populations, is essential for ethical research conduct.