Related Experiment Videos
A 3-year study of medication incidents in an acute general hospital
1Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Background And Objective:
Inappropriate medication use may harm patients. We analysed medication incident reports (MIRs) as part of the feedback loop for quality assurance.
Methods:
From all MIRs in a university-affiliated acute general hospital in Hong Kong in the period January 2004-December 2006, we analysed the time, nature, source and severity of medication errors.
Results:
There were 1278 MIRs with 36 (range 15-107) MIRs per month on average. The number of MIRs fell from 649 in 2004, to 353 in 2005, and to 276 in 2006. The most common type was wrong strength/dosage (36.5%), followed by wrong drug (16.7%), wrong frequency (7.7%), wrong formulation (7.0%), wrong patient (6.9%) and wrong instruction (3.1%). 60.9%, 53.7% and 84.0% of MIRs arose from handwritten prescription (HP) rather than the computerized medication order entry in 2004, 2005 and 2006 respectively. In 43.1% of MIRs, preregistration house officers were involved. Most errors (80.2%) were detected before any drug was wrongly administered. The medications were administered in 212 cases (19.7%), which resulted in an untoward effect in nine cases (0.8%).
Conclusions:
The most common errors were wrong dosage and wrong drug. Many incidents involved preregistration house officers and HPs. Our computerized systems appeared to reduce medication incidents.
Insights
Medication errors like wrong dosage or drug are common. Computerized systems reduced incidents, while handwritten prescriptions and junior doctors were frequent sources of errors.
Area of Science:
- Patient Safety
- Healthcare Quality Improvement
- Medication Error Analysis
Background:
- Inappropriate medication use poses significant patient harm risks.
- Medication incident reports (MIRs) serve as a crucial feedback mechanism for quality assurance in healthcare settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze medication incident reports (MIRs) to identify patterns and sources of medication errors.
- To evaluate the impact of computerized medication order entry systems versus handwritten prescriptions on medication safety.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1278 medication incident reports (MIRs) from a Hong Kong university-affiliated hospital (2004-2006).
- Categorization of errors by time, nature, source, and severity.
- Comparison of error rates associated with handwritten prescriptions (HP) versus computerized medication order entry.
Main Results:
- A decreasing trend in MIRs was observed from 2004 to 2006.
- The most frequent errors were wrong strength/dosage (36.5%) and wrong drug (16.7%).
- Handwritten prescriptions (HP) and preregistration house officers were significantly involved in medication errors, though most errors were detected before administration.
Conclusions:
- Wrong dosage and wrong drug errors are the most prevalent.
- Handwritten prescriptions (HP) and involvement of preregistration house officers are key areas for intervention.
- Implementation of computerized systems shows a promising reduction in medication incidents.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...