Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Allowing autonomous agents freedom.

A J Cronin1

  • 1Institute of Medicine Law and Bioethics and Institute of Science Ethics and Innovation, School of Law, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. Antonia.Cronin@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk

Journal of Medical Ethics
|March 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of remote OMFS assessments in the era of pandemic COVID-19 control measures.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2020
Same author

Compliance with the minimum dataset of the British Orthodontic Society/British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons for record keeping for orthognathic patients: retrospective comparative multicentre audit.

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2013
Same author

Management of chronic neuropathic pain following mandibular advancement surgery.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2012
Same author

Requested allocation of a deceased donor organ: laws and misconceptions.

Journal of medical ethics·2010
Same author

Case report: segmental odontomaxillary dysplasia--a rare disorder.

European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry·2008
Same author

Who is at risk? Periodontal disease risk analysis made accessible for the general dental practitioner.

British dental journal·2008
Same journal

Assisted dying and autonomy as an end in itself: a response to Donaldson.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics briefing.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Medical ethics and categorisation.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suspension or prioritisation? Exploring the ethics of age-based rationing in adult ADHD services.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of not knowing who we are talking to in qualitative research.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Suicide is not a public health issue and perhaps very few things should be.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
See all related articles

Living-donor kidney transplantation offers superior outcomes but carries risks for donors. This analysis questions the need for more long-term donor data, arguing that promoting life-saving transplants is ethically permissible.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Transplant Surgery
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • Living-donor kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal failure, with increasing numbers of procedures performed.
  • While beneficial for recipients, living kidney donation involves inherent risks to the donor.
  • Debate exists on whether the risks to living donors are adequately understood and if more long-term outcome data is necessary.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the assertion that medical professionals have underestimated the risks associated with living kidney donation.
  • To determine if extensive long-term outcome data is essential for assessing the permissibility of living donation risks.
  • To address the ethical considerations of promoting living-donor kidney transplantation amidst a global organ shortage.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Philosophical argumentation and ethical analysis.
  • Critique of existing perspectives on risk assessment in living donation.
  • Examination of the ethical imperative to save lives versus donor risk.

Main Results:

  • It is not definitively established that the risks of living kidney donation have been underestimated.
  • The necessity of additional long-term donor outcome data to permit individual risk-taking is questionable.
  • The ethical permissibility of promoting life-saving interventions, like living-donor transplantation, is supported.

Conclusions:

  • The ethical justification for promoting living-donor kidney transplantation does not solely depend on exhaustive long-term donor data.
  • The significant loss of life due to organ shortages necessitates the promotion of transplantation within acceptable ethical bounds.
  • Saving lives through living donation is a morally commendable act that should be encouraged.