Related Experiment Videos

Clinical outcomes after multilesion percutaneous coronary intervention: comparison between exclusive and selective

Olivier F Bertrand1, Benjamin Faurie, Eric Larose

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Hôpital Laval, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, affilié à l'Université Laval, 2725, Chemin Ste Foy, Québec, Canada, G1V 4G5. olivier.bertrand@crhl.ulaval.ca

Insights

A selective drug-eluting stent (DES) strategy for high-restenosis risk lesions was safe and effective, showing similar outcomes to exclusive DES use in patients with multiple coronary lesions.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) often involve multiple lesions.
  • Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis but increase cost and bleeding risk.
  • Optimizing DES use is crucial for patient outcomes and healthcare economics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare outcomes of a selective DES strategy versus an exclusive DES strategy in patients undergoing multi-lesion PCI.
  • To evaluate acute and late clinical events, including major adverse cardiac events and stent thrombosis.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study of 362 patients with 900 multi-lesion PCIs.
  • Selective DES group used DES for lesions meeting 4 high-restenosis risk criteria; exclusive DES group used DES for all lesions.
  • Outcomes assessed at a mean follow-up of 412 days, with propensity score adjustment for multivariate analysis.

Main Results:

  • Major adverse cardiac events (16.8% vs. 18.4%, p=0.78) and revascularization rates (9.9% vs. 10.5%, p=1.0) were similar between exclusive and selective DES groups.
  • Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in revascularization or target lesion revascularization (TLR) between strategies.
  • Stent thrombosis was significantly lower in the selective DES group (0.5%) compared to the exclusive DES group (3.7%, p=0.03).

Conclusions:

  • A selective DES strategy, using DES only for high-risk lesions, is safe and effective compared to exclusive DES use in multi-lesion PCI.
  • The selective approach may reduce stent thrombosis rates.
  • Further prospective randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings and validate the criteria-based selective DES strategy.
Abstract