Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Prehospital diagnosis in STEMI patients treated by primary PCI: the key to rapid reperfusion
R P Vermeulen1, T Jaarsma, F G A Hanenburg
1Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcentre, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Insights
Prehospital diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and direct referral to a catheterization lab achieved timely treatment in 82% of patients. Older age was linked to longer delays in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) requires rapid intervention, ideally with a door-to-balloon time under 90 minutes.
- Achieving this goal in practice is challenging.
- Prehospital diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is crucial for reducing treatment times, especially with direct transport to intervention-capable centers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the time from prehospital STEMI diagnosis to balloon inflation.
- To identify factors contributing to treatment delays in patients directly referred for primary PCI.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional descriptive study design was employed.
- Data were collected on patients undergoing primary PCI following a prehospital STEMI diagnosis.
Main Results:
- The median prehospital diagnosis-to-balloon time was 64 minutes for direct referrals and 75 minutes for those initially admitted to the coronary care unit.
- Eighteen patients experienced delays exceeding 90 minutes.
- Older age was significantly associated with longer delay times (p=0.041).
- Delays were not significantly associated with diabetes, time from symptom onset to diagnosis, or time of day.
- Catheterization laboratory unavailability due to ongoing procedures caused delays in ten cases.
Conclusions:
- Prehospital STEMI diagnosis and direct referral to a catheterization laboratory enable achieving a prehospital diagnosis-to-balloon time under 90 minutes in 82% of cases.
- Older patients represent a population at risk for longer treatment delays.
- Direct referral strategies are effective but require attention to potential bottlenecks like laboratory availability.
Background:
Primary coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction should be performed as quickly as possible, with a door-toballoon time of less then 90 minutes. However, in daily practice this cannot always be achieved. Prehospital diagnosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is of major importance in reducing time to treatment, in particular when patients can be transported directly to a centre with interventional capacities.
Objectives:
The aim of the current study was to evaluate the time from prehospital diagnosis of STEMI to balloon inflation and identify factors related to treatment delay in patients directly referred to the catheterisation laboratory of the University Medical Centre of Groningen.
Methods:
A cross-sectional descriptive design was used to collect data on patients treated with primary PCI after prehospital diagnosis of STEMI.
Results:
Median prehospital diagnosis-to-balloon time was 64 minutes for patients directly admitted to the catheterisation laboratory and 75 minutes for patients initially admitted to the coronary care unit. A delay longer than 90 minutes was observed in 18 patients. Higher age was associated with longer delay times (p=0.041). Long delays were not associated with diabetes (p=0.293), time from symptom onset to prehospital diagnosis (p=0.87) or time of day (p=0.09). Initial unavailability of the catheterisation laboratory due to running procedures contributed to longer delay times in ten cases.
Conclusion:
Prehospital diagnosis of STEMI and direct referral to a catheterisation laboratory for primary PCI allows a prehospital diagnosis-toballoon time of less than 90 minutes in 82% of patients. Older patients are at risk of longer delays. (Neth Heart J 2008;16:5-9.).
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
