Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparing dependent correlations.

Rand R Wilcox1, Tian Tian

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089-1061, USA. rwilcox@usc.edu

The Journal of General Psychology
|March 6, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From significant to meaningful: ATOMizing the study of sex differences and similarities.

Frontiers in neuroendocrinology·2026
Same author

Influence of Body Configuration on Kinetics and Multijoint Control Strategies Sprinters Use During the First Step Out of Blocks.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same author

Associations of sleep behaviors with white matter hyperintensity volume in middle-aged to older adults.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2026
Same author

Public Health.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

From significant to meaningful: ATOMizing the study of sex differences and similarities.

Frontiers in neuroendocrinology·2025
Same author

Chronic inflammation mediates the relationship between physical activity and telomere length.

GeroScience·2025
Same journal

The influence of the Big Five personality traits on daily internal and external aggression tendencies: a dual-pathway mechanism from the perspective of social comparison theory-a diary study.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Cognitive and emotional benefits of piano training: effects on working memory and psychological well-being.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

The efficacy of mindfulness based interventions in mitigating stress and fostering enhanced mindfulness among higher education students.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Age and gender differences in the factor structure of cognitive monitoring.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

How social context modulates the roles of fairness, reciprocity, and empathy on advantageous inequity aversion.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Predicting a few or many friends in schoolchildren: a machine learning approach.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
See all related articles

Researchers found new methods to compare dependent correlations, but two methods showed low power and Type I errors below the nominal level when data distribution was not normal. This impacts statistical analysis reliability.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Statistics

Background:

  • Previous research indicated issues with Type I errors in methods for comparing dependent correlations, even with large sample sizes.
  • The .05 significance level can lead to actual Type I error probabilities exceeding .10 in some comparison methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend previous research on comparing dependent correlations by evaluating alternative statistical methods.
  • To identify methods that maintain the nominal Type I error rate under various conditions.

Main Methods:

  • A Monte Carlo simulation was employed to assess the performance of different statistical methods.
  • The study examined Type I error rates and statistical power under conditions violating the normality assumption.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three methods were identified that did not inflate the Type I error rate above the nominal level.
  • However, two of these methods exhibited low statistical power and Type I error rates below the nominal level when normality assumptions were violated.
  • Comparisons were made with E. J. Williams' (1959) established method.

Conclusions:

  • While some new methods control Type I errors, their effectiveness is compromised under non-normal data distributions.
  • Researchers must consider data distribution when selecting methods for comparing dependent correlations to ensure accurate statistical inference.