Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026

The Synthesis, Characterization and Reactivity of a Series of Ruthenium N-triphosPh Complexes
Published on: April 10, 2015
Computational study of the factors controlling enantioselectivity in ruthenium(II) hydrogenation catalysts
Devis Di Tommaso1, Samuel A French, Antonio Zanotti-Gerosa
1Davy Faraday Research Laboratory, Kathleen Lonsdale Building, University College of London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom. uccaddi@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract:
The reduction of prochiral ketones catalyzed by Ru(diphosphine)(diamine) complexes has been studied at the DFT-PBE level of theory. Calculations have been conducted on real size systems [trans-Ru(H)2(S, S-dpen)(S-xylbinap) + acetophenone], [trans-Ru(H)2(S, S-dpen)(S-tolbinap) + acetophenone] and [trans-Ru(H)2(S, S-dpen)(S-xylbinap) + cyclohexyl methyl ketone] with the aim of identifying the factors controlling the enantioselectivity in Ru(diphosphine)(diamine) catalysts. The high enantiomeric excess (99%) in the hydrogenation of acetophenone catalyzed by trans-Ru(H)2(S, S-dpen)(S-xylbinap) has been explained in terms of the existence of a stable intermediate along the reaction pathway associated with the (R)-alcohol. The formation of this intermediate is hindered with the competitive pathways, which consequently increases the activation energy for the hydrogen transfer acetophenone/(S)-phenylethanol reaction. For the [trans-Ru(H)2(S, S-dpen)(S-tolbinap) + acetophenone] system, the lower enantioselectivity (i.e. 80%) is rationalized by the smaller differences in the activation energy between the competitive pathways which differentiate between the two diastereomeric approaches of the prochiral ketone. The DFT-PBE results suggest that this reaction is driven to the (R)-product only by the process of binding the acetophenone to the active site of the trans-Ru(H) 2(S, S-dpen)(S-tolbinap) catalyst. For the hydrogenation of cyclohexyl methyl ketone catalyzed by trans-Ru(H)2(S, S-dpen)(S-xylbinap), the low performance in the enantioselective hydrogenation of the dialkyl ketone (i.e. 37%) is again explained by the small differences in the activation and binding energies which are the factors which could effectively differentiate between the two alkyl groups.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reduction of Alkenes: Asymmetric Catalytic Hydrogenation
The metal catalyst used can be either heterogeneous or homogeneous. When hydrogenation of an alkene generates a chiral center, a pair of enantiomeric products is expected to form. However, an enantiomeric excess of one of the products can be facilitated using an enantioselective reaction or an...
Reduction of Alkenes: Catalytic Hydrogenation
Metals like palladium, platinum, and nickel are commonly used in their solid forms — fine powder on an inert surface. As these catalysts remain insoluble in the reaction mixture, they are referred to as heterogeneous catalysts.
The hydrogenation process takes place on the surface of...
Regioselectivity and Stereochemistry of Hydroboration
Hydroboration proceeds in a concerted fashion with the attack of borane on the π bond, giving a cyclic four-centered transition state. The –BH2 group is bonded to the less substituted carbon and –H to the more substituted carbon. The concerted nature requires the simultaneous addition of –H and –BH2 across the same face of the alkene giving syn stereochemistry.
Heterogeneous Catalysis
Regioselectivity of Electrophilic Additions to Alkenes: Markovnikov's Rule
The hydrohalogenation of an unsymmetrical alkene can yield two haloalkane products, depending on which vinylic carbon takes up the halogen. However, one product usually predominates, where hydrogen adds to the vinylic carbon bearing the...
Regioselectivity and Stereochemistry of Acid-Catalyzed Hydration

