Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity Testing in Animals

Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...

Toxicokinetics: Overview

Toxicokinetics: Overview

Studies that assess how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolized, and excreted (ADME) at toxic doses are termed toxicokinetics. Understanding toxicokinetics helps predict adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and manage toxicity in humans.Toxicokinetics differs from pharmacokinetics mainly in the dose levels studied, with toxicokinetics focusing on higher toxic doses. The kinetics at these levels can be non-linear due to altered physiological processes. Toxicodynamics examines the relationship...

Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model

Pharmacodynamic Models: Linear Concentration–Effect Model

The linear concentration–effect model, underpinned by the principle that pharmacological effect (E) is directly proportional to plasma drug concentration (C), emerges as a pivotal simplification of the Emax model for conditions where C is significantly less than EC50. This model portrays a linear trajectory of the concentration–effect relationship when drug levels are markedly below the EC50 threshold.Despite its inherent assumption of continuous effect augmentation with increasing drug...

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic Models: Direct Effect Model and Indirect Response Model

Pharmacodynamic models are essential tools in understanding the relationship between drug concentrations and their effects on biological systems. By characterizing the dynamics of drug action, these models guide dose selection, optimize therapeutic efficacy, and inform the development of new drugs. Two major classes of pharmacodynamic models include direct effect and indirect response models.Direct Effect ModelsDirect effect models describe the immediate relationship between drug concentration...

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic Models: Overview

Pharmacodynamic (PD) responses describe the interaction between a drug and its biological target, culminating in a physiological effect. These responses can be classified into different types: continuous variables, such as blood glucose levels; categorical outcomes, like survival rates; and time-to-event metrics, such as disease progression. Understanding and modeling PD responses are critical for optimizing drug efficacy and safety.PD models describe the relationship between drug concentration...

Pharmacodynamic Models: Emax Drug–Concentration Effect Model

Pharmacodynamic Models: E_max Drug–Concentration Effect Model

The Emax drug-concentration effect model is central to pharmacodynamics in drug discovery and development. This model is predicated on the receptor occupancy theory, which posits that the effect of a drug is directly related to the number of receptors occupied by the drug and the resultant complex formation.The model describes the reversible interaction between a drug (C) and a receptor (R) to form a drug-receptor complex (RC). The kinetics of this interaction are quantified by an equation that...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Comparison of aquatic system models using outdoor mesocosm data for ecological risk assessment, part II: results and outlooks.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2026

Same author

Predicting Earthworm Toxicity in Untested Soils with Toxicokinetic Modelling: Concept and Validation.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2026

Same author

Organic matter dependent toxicokinetic of lindane in soil: Insights from enchytraeid bioaccumulation studies.

Ecotoxicology and environmental safety·2026

Same author

The prevalence and acceptability of mesocosm studies submitted for macrophytes in pesticide risk assessment.

Integrated environmental assessment and management·2025

Same author

Critical biotransformation half-lives of chemicals in air-breathing wildlife to assess food-chain bioaccumulation and biomagnification.

Environmental science. Processes & impacts·2025

Same author

Evaluating the impact of experimental duration on toxicokinetic parameters and bioaccumulation factors in earthworm (Eisenia fetida) studies.

Environmental toxicology and chemistry·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

Toxicodynamic assumptions in ecotoxicological hazard models.

Roman Ashauer¹, Colin D Brown

¹Eawag-Aquatic Research, Uberlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland. roman.ashauer@eawag.ch

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

|March 6, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study unifies ecotoxicological models, including critical body residue, by clarifying assumptions about recovery and thresholds. Mathematical analysis aids in selecting the most appropriate models for environmental risk assessment.

More Related Videos

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Published on: April 28, 2023

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Ecotoxicological Methodologies to Evaluate Biomarkers at Different Scales in Neotropical Anurans

Published on: April 28, 2023

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Advanced 3D Liver Models for In vitro Genotoxicity Testing Following Long-Term Nanomaterial Exposure

Published on: June 5, 2020

Area of Science:

Ecotoxicology
Environmental Chemistry
Mathematical Biology

Background:

Existing ecotoxicological models and dynamic formulations, such as the critical body residue concept, are widely used.
Understanding the assumptions underlying these models regarding recovery speed and thresholds is crucial for accurate environmental risk assessment.
A unified framework for these models is needed to facilitate model selection and application.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine existing toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic models and dynamic formulations of ecotoxicological concepts.
To clarify the underlying assumptions regarding speed of recovery and thresholds within these models.
To develop a unifying mathematical framework for ecotoxicological models to aid in their selection.

Main Methods:

Review and analysis of existing toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic models.
Examination of dynamic formulations of ecotoxicological concepts, including the critical body residue concept.
Rigorous mathematical treatment to establish a unifying framework for the models.

Main Results:

Existing ecotoxicological models and concepts were analyzed.
Assumptions about recovery speed and thresholds were clarified.
A unifying mathematical framework was developed, demonstrating that various models can be integrated.

Conclusions:

A rigorous mathematical treatment successfully unifies diverse ecotoxicological models.
Clarifying model assumptions, particularly concerning recovery and thresholds, is essential.
The developed framework aids in the appropriate selection of ecotoxicological models for environmental applications.