Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System01:26

Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System

At the different levels of the healthcare system, we see varying methods of healthcare used. These methods include managed care systems, case management, and primary healthcare.
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prospective economic evaluation ancillary to a trial of higher versus lower hemoglobin transfusion thresholds for preterm infants.

Neonatology·2026
Same author

Hypnotic safety suggestions reduce cortisol awakening response and morning heart rate in daily life.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Prediction of anxiety in children aged 7-12 during preoperative anaesthesia evaluation - a prospective observational study.

Perioperative medicine (London, England)·2026
Same author

SARS-CoV-2 evolution enhances endocytic uptake while preserving TMPRSS2-dependent fusion.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Hypnosis and affective neuroscience.

International review of neurobiology·2025
Same author

Back to the wildtype: SARS-CoV-2 evolution in critically ill patients with severe lung failure.

Infection·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

Implementing a chronic disease strategy in two remote Indigenous Australian settings: a multi-method pilot

Peter d'Abbs1, Barbara Schmidt, Kathryn Dougherty

  • 1School of Public Health, Tropical Medicine and Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia. peter.dabbs@jcu.edu.au

The Australian Journal of Rural Health
|March 6, 2008
PubMed
Summary

An evaluation framework effectively assessed the North Queensland Indigenous Community الدعم Services (NQICDS) implementation in two communities. Community A showed more progress than Community B, highlighting common challenges in health service integration and client self-management support.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2026

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Public Health
  • Indigenous Health
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • The North Queensland Indigenous Community الدعم Services (NQICDS) aimed to improve primary healthcare delivery.
  • Evaluating the implementation of such programs is crucial for understanding their effectiveness and identifying areas for improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test a framework for evaluating the implementation of the NQICDS in two North Queensland Indigenous communities.
  • To assess the acceptability and effectiveness of the evaluation framework at the primary health centre level.

Main Methods:

  • A process evaluation was conducted involving health centre staff in both communities.
  • Clinical audits of scheduled services and primary health performance indicators were performed on random adult samples (n=30).
  • Ethnographic fieldwork was undertaken with the resident populations, utilizing a System Assessment Tool for qualitative data.

Main Results:

  • Implementation of the NQICDS had progressed further in Community A compared to Community B across most indicators.
  • Common challenges identified included a lack of linkages between health centres and other organizations.
  • Deficiencies in supporting client self-management were also noted in both communities.

Conclusions:

  • The developed evaluation framework proved to be an effective and acceptable tool for monitoring NQICDS implementation.
  • The framework is suitable for use at the primary health centre level to guide ongoing program improvements.